Protech
The label says 8.7 cal/cm². The study says 6.2 at the working distance. The check is one comparison, and layers do not add.
— x
At 1.0 or more the clothing meets or exceeds the exposure
Category minimums are those of NFPA 70E Table 130.7(C)(15)(c) (2018 numbering) as reproduced by e-hazard and EC&M: 4, 8, 25 and 40 cal/cm² for PPE Categories 1 to 4; check the edition your programme cites, as later editions renumber the tables. The 1.2 cal/cm² (5 J/cm²) threshold is where incident energy falls to the onset of a second-degree burn and is how the arc flash boundary is defined. Under the incident energy analysis method the arc rating must meet or exceed the estimated incident energy; a design margin is your programme's choice, not the standard's. The arc rating is the ATPV, the incident energy at which there is a 50% probability of a second-degree burn through the fabric, or the EBT where the fabric breaks open first; the label carries whichever applies. The category output reads the garment label only: it does not choose a PPE category from the incident energy, because the category method and the incident energy method are not to be mixed. **A layered system is rated by testing the system; this tool never adds layers.**
Arc-Rated Clothing Check: Incident Energy vs Arc Rating & NFPA 70E Category — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.