Fibre Testing & Bale Management

Cotton Contamination & Colour Grade Risk Scorer

One polypropylene strand survives dyeing and rejects the piece. Never read the average alone.

Contaminant Counts Per 100 g of lint
count

The one that rejects finished pieces

count
count
count
Colour Grade HVI colorimeter
%
Lot Value Exposure
t
currency/t

Composite Contamination Risk

— /100

Higher is worse. Read the polypropylene share before trusting it

Where the Risk Sits

Share of Risk from Polypropylene
— %
Share from Stickiness
— %
Colour Grade Index
— /100
Expected Downgrade
— %
Lot Value at Risk
— currency
Lot Value
— currency

The weights here are a stated convention, not a measurement: polypropylene is weighted an order of magnitude above the graded defects because its failure mode is categorical rather than proportional — it does not make the yarn slightly worse, it makes one finished piece unsellable, and it is detected after every value-adding process has already been paid for. That is why the polypropylene share is printed separately and why a lot with any PP at all should be stopped and hand-sorted whatever the composite says. Stickiness behaves differently again: it is a processing failure, not an appearance defect, and honeydew contamination that passes a visual inspection can still shut a spinning frame down through roller lapping in humid weather, so read the SCT count against your own mill humidity rather than against a trade limit. Counts depend entirely on sample size and inspector diligence — an untrained inspection reliably returns zero.

Cotton Contamination & Colour Grade Risk Scorer — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.