Fibre Testing & Bale Management

Bale Laydown Constraint Window & Minimum Bale Count

Spread falls with the square root of bale count. Doubling the laydown buys 41%, not 100%.

Laydown Planned mix
Micronaire Constraint Per-bale spread vs tolerance
mic
mic
%
Strength Constraint Per-bale spread vs tolerance
g/tex
g/tex
%

Minimum Bales Required

— bales

The larger of the two constraints — the binding property sets the laydown size

Constraint Comparison

Micronaire Mix-to-Mix CV at Planned Count
— %
Bales Micronaire Demands
— bales
Strength Mix-to-Mix CV at Planned Count
— %
Bales Strength Demands
— bales
Tightest Sigma Margin
— ×
Bales Beyond the Requirement
— bales

The square-root law assumes the bales in a laydown are drawn independently. They are not: bales from one gin, one field or one arrival lot are correlated, and a laydown built from three trucks behaves like three samples rather than forty-eight. Correlation inflates the true mix-to-mix spread well above what this predicts, which is why laydown rules specify a spread of origins and not just a count. The model also treats micronaire and strength as separate constraints when they covary within a growth, so satisfying both simultaneously can need more bales than either alone. Nothing here addresses the sequence in which bales enter the mixing line — a laydown with the correct mean and a systematic drift from first bale to last produces exactly the barré this calculation was meant to prevent.

Bale Laydown Constraint Window & Minimum Bale Count — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.