Colour Management
A pair that never matched under D65 is not metameric, it is wrong. The two faults have different remedies.
— dE
Across the test illuminants, net of the reference mismatch
This is the additive correction of the special index, which subtracts the reference mismatch from the test difference; CIE 15 also describes a multiplicative correction, and the two agree closely while the reference mismatch is small and diverge once it is not. Where the D65 difference is a substantial fraction of the tolerance, correct the match first and re-measure rather than trusting either correction to see through it. The index is a property of the PAIR, not of the sample: a batch can be metameric against a dyed standard and acceptable against a pigment-printed one, or vice versa, because metamerism arises from the difference in spectral curves rather than from either curve alone. That is also why the remedy is a change of dye combination - typically replacing one component with a dye whose absorption band sits where the one in the standard sits - and why it must be settled at lab-dip stage, since no production correction reaches it. Illuminant A and F11 are the conventional pair because they bracket the practical failure modes, tungsten warmth and narrow-band fluorescent spikes, but a buyer with LED store lighting is testing under something this pair does not represent well, and an LED spectrum should be added where that is the selling environment.
Special Index of Metamerism Across Illuminants — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.