Nonwovens

Roll Build, Splice Count & Converting Yield

Length grows with the square of diameter. Splices cost the same whatever the roll holds, so short rolls pay the toll more often.

Roll Geometry What is wound
mm
mm
mm

Wound thickness under tension, not the free-state caliper

m
g/m2
Splicing A fixed toll, however long the roll
m

Web available between one splice and the next

m
min
m/min

Wound Length

— m

From the annulus between core and finished diameter

Build, Splices & Yield

Roll Weight
— kg
Radial Build
— mm
Wraps on the Roll
— nos
Splices in the Roll
— nos
Web Wasted
— m
Usable Length
— m
Yield Lost to Splices
— %
Run Time per Roll
— min
Splice Downtime per Roll
— min
Availability Lost
— %

Caliper is the input that decides everything and it is the one most often taken from the wrong measurement: what matters is the compressed thickness of the web as wound under tension, not the free-state caliper from a thickness gauge, and for a lofty nonwoven the two can differ by a factor of two. Back-calculate it from a roll of known length rather than measuring a sample, and the geometry becomes reliable. The model treats caliper as constant through the build, while a real roll is wound harder at the core and softer toward the outside, so the true length sits a little above this figure on a soft-wound roll and a little below on a hard one. Splice count uses a uniform parent-roll interval and assumes every splice falls inside the roll being wound; in practice a splice landing near a set change is often trimmed out at no additional cost, so the waste figure is a mild overstatement and the downtime figure is not. The availability loss is the number worth arguing with a supplier over: at these settings the stops cost several times what the wasted web does, and a converter comparing parent-roll offers on price per kilogram alone is comparing the smaller of the two effects.

Roll Build, Splice Count & Converting Yield — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.