ProWet Processing EconomicsDyeing

What to Do With a Batch That Comes Out Off Shade

A top-up that succeeds nine times in a hundred is not a cheap attempt. It is three wasted processes and a fabric that will not survive the strip it needed in the first place.

What Each Move Costs

Include the machine hours, not only the dyes and chemicals

Dyes, chemicals, steam and the machine hours it holds - a short cycle is still a cycle

Stripping, washing off and dyeing again from the beginning, machine hours included

The days it holds the order and the cloth, whatever the answer turns out to be

What Each Move Does to the Cloth

The cost nobody books, and the reason attempts are not free

Strength, handle and surface lost to another cycle, valued as the discount it will eventually earn

The same, and more of it, because stripping is harsher than dyeing

Before it is no longer sellable as first quality whatever the shade is - this is the number the whole answer turns on

Batches that do not pass first time, at whatever your first-time-right rate actually is

How Far Off, and What Happens Next

One row per shade band your off-shade lots fall into, from marginal to hopeless. The two success columns are the ones worth arguing over: not what the laboratory hopes, but the share of top-ups and strips from that band that actually landed inside tolerance last year. Every dyehouse believes its top-up rate is higher than it is, and the belief is what this sheet is for. The buyer acceptance column is for a shade submitted openly and declared as a variation - it is not a rate of getting away with anything, and a band where the buyer would never be told should be entered at nought. What it loses if downgraded is the value of the lot less what it fetches as it stands, which for a marginally off lot is often a very small number and is the reason a third of them should never go back on a machine.

BandShare of Off-Shade Lots %A Top-Up Succeeds %A Strip Succeeds %The Buyer Accepts It %The Concession If They Do costIt Loses If Downgraded costShare %Top It Up 1/0Strip It 1/0Submit It 1/0Let It Go 1/0Costs, Done Right costIf You Always Top Up costIf You Always Strip costThe Right Move Saves cost/yrOne More Attempt Would Save costRow actions
——————————
——————————
——————————
——————————

Add line opens a form. Cells in the sheet stay directly editable.

How to read this sheet

The number the answer turns on is not a cost. It is how many corrective processes the cloth will take before it is no longer first quality whatever the shade is, and almost nobody writes it down. Once that number exists the whole decision changes character: an attempt is not a small commitment, it is one of a very short supply, and spending one on a nine per cent chance is not caution but waste. The sheet prices what one more of them would be worth, which is the argument for a gentler stripping route or a stronger construction. Why the habits are wrong at both ends. A top-up is put on first because it is the cheapest single move, and on a badly off lot it is three wasted processes before the strip that was always going to be needed. A marginally off lot goes back on a machine because correcting it feels like the professional thing to do, when it could have been sold at a concession smaller than the correction costs. Dyehouses fix the easy ones and give up on the hard ones, and the arithmetic wants the opposite: the lots worth real effort are the bad ones, because a marginal lot has somewhere else to go and a wrong one has not. On submitting a shade. The option priced here is submitting the shade openly, declared as a variation, and being told yes or no. It is not shipping something and hoping the inspection misses it, and a band where the buyer would not in fact be told should be entered at nought acceptance - the sheet will then never recommend it. Submission is allowed once in the arithmetic, because a buyer who has refused a shade does not become more likely to accept it on being asked again. What is not modelled. A failed correction is treated as leaving the lot in the same shade band, which is generous to top-ups: in practice a failed top-up is often further off than before and harder to recover, so the case against attempting the bad ones is stronger than the sheet says. Machine availability is ignored, and in a full dyehouse the real cost of a strip is the batch it displaces rather than the chemicals it uses. And nothing here reduces the number of off-shade lots in the first place, which is worth more than every decision on this sheet put together - this is a sheet about what to do when right-first-time has already failed.

Textile SchoolWhat to Do With a Batch That Comes Out Off Shadewww.textileschool.com

What to Do With a Batch That Comes Out Off Shade — free while in preview, with every line item and the download, at Textile School.