Water Repellency

DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer

C0 usually costs less per kilogram and more per metre, because it is dosed harder. Price the metre, not the drum.

Fabric & Application Pad
g/m²
m
%
C6 Fluorocarbon Incumbent
g/L
/kg
C0 Fluorine-Free Alternative
g/L
/kg
m

C0 Cost Premium

— %

Cost per metre against C6 at working concentrations

Cost Comparison

C6 Cost per Metre
— /m
C0 Cost per Metre
— /m
Difference per 1,000 m
—
Annual Difference
—
Liquor Applied per Metre
— L/m
C0 Chemical per Metre
— g/m

Chemical cost is only part of the switch. C0 systems generally need a higher cure temperature and are less durable to laundering, so re-treatment frequency and stenter energy belong in the same comparison. Regulatory restriction on long-chain fluorochemicals may make this a compliance decision rather than a cost one.

DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.