Home » Calculators » Finishing & Environment » Coating, Lamination & Advanced Finishing » DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Water Repellency

DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

C0 usually costs less per kilogram and more per metre, because it is dosed harder. Price the metre, not the drum.

Fabric & Application Pad
g/m²
m
%
C6 Fluorocarbon Incumbent
g/L
/kg
C0 Fluorine-Free Alternative
g/L
/kg
m

C0 Cost Premium

— %

Cost per metre against C6 at working concentrations

Cost Comparison

C6 Cost per Metre
— /m
C0 Cost per Metre
— /m
Difference per 1,000 m
—
Annual Difference
—
Liquor Applied per Metre
— L/m
C0 Chemical per Metre
— g/m

Chemical cost is only part of the switch. C0 systems generally need a higher cure temperature and are less durable to laundering, so re-treatment frequency and stenter energy belong in the same comparison. Regulatory restriction on long-chain fluorochemicals may make this a compliance decision rather than a cost one.

Using this calculator

About the DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

C0 Cost Premium
costPremium = f( fabricGsm, fabricWidth, wetPickup, c6Concentration, c6Price, c0Concentration, c0Price, annualMetres )

Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
fabricGsmFabric Areal Weightg/m²
fabricWidthFabric Widthm
wetPickupWet Pick-up%
c6ConcentrationC6 Concentrationg/L
c6PriceC6 Price/kg
c0ConcentrationC0 Concentrationg/L
c0PriceC0 Price/kg
annualMetresAnnual Volumem
costPremiumC0 Cost Premium%
c6CostPerMetreC6 Cost per Metre/m
c0CostPerMetreC0 Cost per Metre/m
costDifferencePer1000mDifference per 1,000 m—
annualDifferenceAnnual Difference—
liquorPerMetreLiquor Applied per MetreL/m
c0ChemicalPerMetreC0 Chemical per Metreg/m

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 8 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Fabric Areal Weight, Fabric Width, Wet Pick-up, C6 Concentration, C6 Price, C0 Concentration, C0 Price and Annual Volume.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves C0 Cost Premium together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — C6 Cost per Metre, C0 Cost per Metre, Difference per 1,000 m, Annual Difference, Liquor Applied per Metre and C0 Chemical per Metre — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Fabric Areal Weightg/m²20 to 800 g/m²160
Fabric Widthm0.2 to 5 m1.5
Wet Pick-up%10 to 120 %55
C6 Concentrationg/L1 to 200 g/L40
C6 Price/kg0.1 to 200 /kg12
C0 Concentrationg/L1 to 200 g/L60
C0 Price/kg0.1 to 200 /kg9
Annual Volumem100 to 100000000 m500000

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
C0 Cost Premium (headline result)%Cost per metre against C6 at working concentrations
C6 Cost per Metre/m
C0 Cost per Metre/m
Difference per 1,000 m—
Annual Difference—
Liquor Applied per MetreL/m
C0 Chemical per Metreg/m

Worked example

Given

Fabric Areal Weight
160 g/m²
Fabric Width
1.5 m
Wet Pick-up
55 %
C6 Concentration
40 g/L
C6 Price
12 /kg
C0 Concentration
60 g/L
C0 Price
9 /kg
Annual Volume
500000 m

The tool loads with this case already solved — the C0 Cost Premium shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Fabric & Application, C6 Fluorocarbon and C0 Fluorine-Free. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read C0 Cost Premium in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in %.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (C6 Cost per Metre, C0 Cost per Metre, Difference per 1,000 m, Annual Difference, Liquor Applied per Metre and C0 Chemical per Metre) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing C0 Cost Premium before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Coating, Lamination & Advanced Finishing are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — C0 Cost Premium is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Fabric Areal Weight) shows how much of the gap in C0 Cost Premium each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Coating, Lamination & Advanced Finishing practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

  • Chemical cost is only part of the switch. C0 systems generally need a higher cure temperature and are less durable to laundering, so re-treatment frequency and stenter energy belong in the same comparison. Regulatory restriction on long-chain fluorochemicals may make this a compliance decision rather than a cost one.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Fabric Areal Weight 20 to 800 g/m², Fabric Width 0.2 to 5 m and Wet Pick-up 10 to 120 %, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask

What do I need to know before using the DWR C6 vs C0 Water Repellent Cost Optimizer?

Have these to hand: Fabric Areal Weight, Fabric Width, Wet Pick-up, C6 Concentration, C6 Price, C0 Concentration, C0 Price and Annual Volume. With those entered, the tool returns C0 Cost Premium immediately.

What exactly is C0 Cost Premium?

Cost per metre against C6 at working concentrations. It is reported in %. It is derived from Fabric Areal Weight, Fabric Width, Wet Pick-up, C6 Concentration, C6 Price, C0 Concentration, C0 Price and Annual Volume, and is the figure the rest of the Coating, Lamination & Advanced Finishing calculation is built around.

Which units does this calculator expect?

Enter Fabric Areal Weight in g/m², Fabric Width in m, Wet Pick-up in %, C6 Concentration in g/L, C6 Price in /kg, C0 Concentration in g/L, C0 Price in /kg and Annual Volume in m. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.

What are the other figures under the main result?

They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: C6 Cost per Metre, C0 Cost per Metre, Difference per 1,000 m, Annual Difference, Liquor Applied per Metre and C0 Chemical per Metre. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.

Can I rely on this for a production decision?

Chemical cost is only part of the switch. C0 systems generally need a higher cure temperature and are less durable to laundering, so re-treatment frequency and stenter energy belong in the same comparison. Regulatory restriction on long-chain fluorochemicals may make this a compliance decision rather than a cost one. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.

Convert this result

Reference rate of 2026-10-06, published by the European Central Bank. Source

A reference rate is not a dealing rate. Banks and payment providers apply their own spread, so treat this as the mid-market figure a quotation is negotiated around rather than the money that will arrive.

Scroll to Top