Commercial Costing

Fibre-to-Garment Cost Cascade with Compounding Stage Losses

Four respectable yields multiply to 65%. A 320 g garment draws 489 g of fibre, and you pay to process all of it.

Fibre Raw material and spinning
per kg

Landed cost of the fibre or its blend, in whatever currency you quote in. Every result follows that currency.

%

Fibre to yarn. Blowroom droppings, card and comber noil, winding waste. Combed counts sit well below carded here.

per kg in

Charged on the mass entering the stage, so material that later becomes noil is still paid to process.

Fabric Formation, dyeing and finishing
%

Yarn to greige. Knitting waste, weaving hard waste, loom and machine seconds.

per kg in
%

Greige to saleable finished fabric, after shade rejection, reprocessing losses and off-shade rolls held back.

per kg in
Garment Cutting and making
kg

The fabric in the garment as it ships — not the fabric issued to the cutting room.

%

Fabric to panels: marker efficiency, end-of-ply and end-of-roll loss, splice allowance. This is the stage most quotations flatter.

per garment

Sewing, finishing and packing, per garment rather than per kilogram.

Ex-Factory Cost per Garment

— per garment

Fibre plus every conversion, with the losses compounded

What the Cascade Costs

Fibre Drawn per Garment
— kg
Waste Multiplier
— x
Cumulative Yield
— %
Fibre in the Garment
— per garment
Conversion & Making
— per garment
Fibre Share of Cost
— %
Cost of the Losses Alone
— per garment
Cost Move per +10% Fibre
— %

Conversion costs here are charged on the mass ENTERING each stage, not the mass leaving it, which is the point of the tool: a factory pays to blow, card, knit and dye material that it later drops as noil, hard waste or an off-shade roll. Quotations that charge conversion on good output instead will read lower, and will keep reading lower right up until the year-end stock count. The cumulative yield is a product, not an average — the single most common costing error in the industry is to take four yields in the high eighties and reason as though the chain runs at about eighty-eight percent, when it runs at sixty-five. The sensitivity figure answers the merchandiser question directly: because fibre is only part of the cost, a ten percent fibre move does not move the quotation by ten percent, and knowing which fraction it does move is the difference between holding a price and losing a margin. Cut-and-make is per garment because that is how it is quoted and how it behaves; everything upstream is per kilogram because that is how it is bought.

Fibre-to-Garment Cost Cascade with Compounding Stage Losses — free, with the formula and a worked example, at Textile School.