Home » Calculators » Fibre & Raw Material » Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion » Bicomponent Spinneret Flow Ratio Optimizer
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Conjugate Spinning

Bicomponent Spinneret Flow Ratio Optimizer

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Specify by mass, build by volume. With two different melt densities those are not the same split, and the cross-section shows it.

Filament Target
dtex
%
no.
m/min
Polymers Melt densities
g/cm³
g/cm³

Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio

— ×

The ratio the spinneret geometry must deliver

Stream Flows

Core Mass Flow
— g/min
Sheath Mass Flow
— g/min
Core Volume Flow
— cm³/min
Sheath Volume Flow
— cm³/min
Core Share of Cross-Section
— %
Total Throughput
— kg/h

Equal volume flows do not guarantee a concentric fibre: the more viscous melt migrates to the low-shear region, so a large viscosity mismatch between the two polymers will distort the interface whatever the geometry says. Match melt viscosities at the spinning temperature as well as the flows.

Using this calculator

About the Bicomponent Spinneret Flow Ratio Optimizer

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio
volumeRatio = f( filamentDtex, coreShare, holes, spinSpeed, coreDensity, sheathDensity )

Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
filamentDtexFilament Linear Densitydtex
coreShareCore Share by Mass%
holesSpinneret Holesno.
spinSpeedTake-up Speedm/min
coreDensityCore Melt Densityg/cm³
sheathDensitySheath Melt Densityg/cm³
volumeRatioCore-to-Sheath Volume Ratio×
coreMassFlowCore Mass Flowg/min
sheathMassFlowSheath Mass Flowg/min
coreVolumeFlowCore Volume Flowcm³/min
sheathVolumeFlowSheath Volume Flowcm³/min
coreAreaShareCore Share of Cross-Section%
totalThroughputTotal Throughputkg/h

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Filament Linear Density, Core Share by Mass, Spinneret Holes, Take-up Speed, Core Melt Density and Sheath Melt Density.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Core Mass Flow, Sheath Mass Flow, Core Volume Flow, Sheath Volume Flow, Core Share of Cross-Section and Total Throughput — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Filament Linear Densitydtex0.1 to 500 dtex3.5
Core Share by Mass%1 to 99 %40
Spinneret Holesno.1 to 20000 no.1000
Take-up Speedm/min100 to 8000 m/min3000
Core Melt Densityg/cm³0.5 to 2 g/cm³1.38
Sheath Melt Densityg/cm³0.5 to 2 g/cm³0.91

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio (headline result)×The ratio the spinneret geometry must deliver
Core Mass Flowg/min
Sheath Mass Flowg/min
Core Volume Flowcm³/min
Sheath Volume Flowcm³/min
Core Share of Cross-Section%
Total Throughputkg/h

Worked example

Given

Filament Linear Density
3.5 dtex
Core Share by Mass
40 %
Spinneret Holes
1000 no.
Take-up Speed
3000 m/min
Core Melt Density
1.38 g/cm³
Sheath Melt Density
0.91 g/cm³

The tool loads with this case already solved — the Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Filament and Polymers. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in ×.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Core Mass Flow, Sheath Mass Flow, Core Volume Flow, Sheath Volume Flow, Core Share of Cross-Section and Total Throughput) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Filament Linear Density) shows how much of the gap in Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

  • Equal volume flows do not guarantee a concentric fibre: the more viscous melt migrates to the low-shear region, so a large viscosity mismatch between the two polymers will distort the interface whatever the geometry says. Match melt viscosities at the spinning temperature as well as the flows.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Filament Linear Density 0.1 to 500 dtex, Core Share by Mass 1 to 99 % and Spinneret Holes 1 to 20000 no., and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask

What do I need to know before using the Bicomponent Spinneret Flow Ratio Optimizer?

Have these to hand: Filament Linear Density, Core Share by Mass, Spinneret Holes, Take-up Speed, Core Melt Density and Sheath Melt Density. With those entered, the tool returns Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio immediately.

What exactly is Core-to-Sheath Volume Ratio?

The ratio the spinneret geometry must deliver. It is reported in ×. It is derived from Filament Linear Density, Core Share by Mass, Spinneret Holes, Take-up Speed, Core Melt Density and Sheath Melt Density, and is the figure the rest of the Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion calculation is built around.

Which units does this calculator expect?

Enter Filament Linear Density in dtex, Core Share by Mass in %, Spinneret Holes in no., Take-up Speed in m/min, Core Melt Density in g/cm³ and Sheath Melt Density in g/cm³. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.

What are the other figures under the main result?

They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Core Mass Flow, Sheath Mass Flow, Core Volume Flow, Sheath Volume Flow, Core Share of Cross-Section and Total Throughput. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.

Can I rely on this for a production decision?

Equal volume flows do not guarantee a concentric fibre: the more viscous melt migrates to the low-shear region, so a large viscosity mismatch between the two polymers will distort the interface whatever the geometry says. Match melt viscosities at the spinning temperature as well as the flows. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.

Scroll to Top