Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
A part-filled jet does not use less liquor. It holds its minimum volume and raises the liquor ratio instead, and every gram-per-litre chemical follows.
Effective Liquor Ratio
—:1
What this batch actually runs at, not what the machine is rated at
Load & Penalty
Fill Ratio
—%
Volume at Full Load
—L
Volume this Batch Uses
—L
Liquor Ratio Penalty
—:1
Chemical Overdose per kg
—%
Liquor Carried for No Fabric
—L
Smallest Batch at Design Ratio
—kg
Electrolyte per Batch
—kg
Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor
—kg
Water per kg of Fabric
—L/kg
Minimum circulating volume is a machine property and the number that makes this calculation worth doing, so take it from the manufacturer or from the level gauge at the point the pump cavitates, never from the nominal ratio multiplied by some fraction. Modern low-liquor jets hold their ratio down to a much lower fill than older winches and overflow machines, which is precisely the case this tool is built to let a dyehouse quantify before it replaces anything. The chemical overdose figure applies only to auxiliaries dosed in grams per litre; dyes are dosed on fabric weight and do not scale with the bath, so a part load wastes salt and alkali without wasting dyestuff - which is why the loss hides from a costing built on dye consumption alone. Energy follows liquor rather than fabric too, so the heating cost per kilogram carries the same penalty as the salt, and on a full-cycle reactive dyeing it is usually the larger of the two. The tool says nothing about whether a batch will run well: a machine loaded far below capacity can rope, tangle or crease for reasons of fabric transport that have nothing to do with liquor ratio, and a batch far above nominal will do worse.
Using this calculator
About the Dyeing Machine Fill Ratio & Part-Load Penalty
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
The volume the machine really holdsactualVolume = max( batchWeight x designRatio, minimumVolume )
The maximum is the whole mechanism. Below the crossover the machine stops following the batch and holds its own floor.
What the batch actually runs ateffectiveRatio = actualVolume / batchWeight
A 300 kg batch in a 500 kg machine with a 2,400 litre floor runs at 8:1, not the 6:1 on the machine plate.
The penalty, and the batch that avoids itoverdose = (effectiveRatio / designRatio - 1) x 100 minBatch = minimumVolume / designRatio
Every gram-per-litre chemical is overdosed by exactly the ratio penalty. The minimum economic batch is where the two volumes meet.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
nominalCapacity
Nominal Capacity
kg
nominalLiquorRatio
Design Liquor Ratio
:1
minimumVolume
Minimum Circulating Volume
L
batchWeight
Batch Weight
kg
saltDose
Electrolyte Dose
g/L
effectiveLiquorRatio
Effective Liquor Ratio
:1
fillRatio
Fill Ratio
%
nominalVolume
Volume at Full Load
L
actualVolume
Volume this Batch Uses
L
liquorRatioPenalty
Liquor Ratio Penalty
:1
chemicalOverdose
Chemical Overdose per kg
%
excessVolume
Liquor Carried for No Fabric
L
minEconomicBatch
Smallest Batch at Design Ratio
kg
saltPerBatch
Electrolyte per Batch
kg
saltWasted
Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor
kg
waterPerKg
Water per kg of Fabric
L/kg
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 5 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Nominal Capacity, Design Liquor Ratio, Minimum Circulating Volume, Batch Weight and Electrolyte Dose.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Effective Liquor Ratio together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Fill Ratio, Volume at Full Load, Volume this Batch Uses, Liquor Ratio Penalty, Chemical Overdose per kg, Liquor Carried for No Fabric, Smallest Batch at Design Ratio, Electrolyte per Batch, Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor and Water per kg of Fabric — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Nominal Capacity
kg
5 to 10000 kg
500
Rated fabric load of the machine
Design Liquor Ratio
:1
2 to 40 :1
6
The ratio the machine achieves at full load
Minimum Circulating Volume
L
20 to 100000 L
2400
Below this the pump loses flood and the machine will not run
Batch Weight
kg
1 to 10000 kg
300
Fabric in the machine for this run
Electrolyte Dose
g/L
0 to 300 g/L
60
Charged on liquor volume, which is the whole problem
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Effective Liquor Ratio (headline result)
:1
What this batch actually runs at, not what the machine is rated at
Fill Ratio
%
Volume at Full Load
L
Volume this Batch Uses
L
Liquor Ratio Penalty
:1
Chemical Overdose per kg
%
Liquor Carried for No Fabric
L
Smallest Batch at Design Ratio
kg
Electrolyte per Batch
kg
Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor
kg
Water per kg of Fabric
L/kg
Worked example
Given
Nominal Capacity
500 kg
Design Liquor Ratio
6 :1
Minimum Circulating Volume
2400 L
Batch Weight
300 kg
Electrolyte Dose
60 g/L
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Effective Liquor Ratio shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Machine and Batch. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Effective Liquor Ratio in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in :1.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Fill Ratio, Volume at Full Load, Volume this Batch Uses, Liquor Ratio Penalty, Chemical Overdose per kg, Liquor Carried for No Fabric, Smallest Batch at Design Ratio, Electrolyte per Batch, Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor and Water per kg of Fabric) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Effective Liquor Ratio before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Effective Liquor Ratio is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Nominal Capacity) shows how much of the gap in Effective Liquor Ratio each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Minimum circulating volume is a machine property and the number that makes this calculation worth doing, so take it from the manufacturer or from the level gauge at the point the pump cavitates, never from the nominal ratio multiplied by some fraction. Modern low-liquor jets hold their ratio down to a much lower fill than older winches and overflow machines, which is precisely the case this tool is built to let a dyehouse quantify before it replaces anything. The chemical overdose figure applies only to auxiliaries dosed in grams per litre; dyes are dosed on fabric weight and do not scale with the bath, so a part load wastes salt and alkali without wasting dyestuff - which is why the loss hides from a costing built on dye consumption alone. Energy follows liquor rather than fabric too, so the heating cost per kilogram carries the same penalty as the salt, and on a full-cycle reactive dyeing it is usually the larger of the two. The tool says nothing about whether a batch will run well: a machine loaded far below capacity can rope, tangle or crease for reasons of fabric transport that have nothing to do with liquor ratio, and a batch far above nominal will do worse.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Nominal Capacity 5 to 10000 kg, Design Liquor Ratio 2 to 40 :1 and Minimum Circulating Volume 20 to 100000 L, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Dyeing Machine Fill Ratio & Part-Load Penalty?
Have these to hand: Nominal Capacity, Design Liquor Ratio, Minimum Circulating Volume, Batch Weight and Electrolyte Dose. With those entered, the tool returns Effective Liquor Ratio immediately.
What exactly is Effective Liquor Ratio?
What this batch actually runs at, not what the machine is rated at. It is reported in :1. It is derived from Nominal Capacity, Design Liquor Ratio, Minimum Circulating Volume, Batch Weight and Electrolyte Dose, and is the figure the rest of the Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Nominal Capacity in kg, Design Liquor Ratio in :1, Minimum Circulating Volume in L, Batch Weight in kg and Electrolyte Dose in g/L. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Fill Ratio, Volume at Full Load, Volume this Batch Uses, Liquor Ratio Penalty, Chemical Overdose per kg, Liquor Carried for No Fabric, Smallest Batch at Design Ratio, Electrolyte per Batch, Electrolyte Charged to Empty Liquor and Water per kg of Fabric. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Minimum circulating volume is a machine property and the number that makes this calculation worth doing, so take it from the manufacturer or from the level gauge at the point the pump cavitates, never from the nominal ratio multiplied by some fraction. Modern low-liquor jets hold their ratio down to a much lower fill than older winches and overflow machines, which is precisely the case this tool is built to let a dyehouse quantify before it replaces anything. The chemical overdose figure applies only to auxiliaries dosed in grams per litre; dyes are dosed on fabric weight and do not scale with the bath, so a part load wastes salt and alkali without wasting dyestuff - which is why the loss hides from a costing built on dye consumption alone. Energy follows liquor rather than fabric too, so the heating cost per kilogram carries the same penalty as the salt, and on a full-cycle reactive dyeing it is usually the larger of the two. The tool says nothing about whether a batch will run well: a machine loaded far below capacity can rope, tangle or crease for reasons of fabric transport that have nothing to do with liquor ratio, and a batch far above nominal will do worse. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.