HEPA Filter Pleat Geometry to Airflow Optimisation
Put this calculator on your own site
Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
There is a pitch past which more pleats make the filter worse. More media, more cost, more pressure drop.
Total Pressure Drop
—Pa
Media plus channel losses at the design airflow
Pleat Pack Behaviour
Media Area
—m²
Media Face Velocity
—cm/s
Media Pressure Drop
—Pa
Channel Pressure Drop
—Pa
Loss-Minimising Pitch
—mm
The channel loss coefficient is a lumped fit standing in for a real viscous-flow solution in a tapering wedge, and the optimum pitch is only as good as that fit — recover it from pressure drop measured across at least two pleat pitches on the same media before trusting the recommendation. Both terms are clean-filter values: dust loads unevenly along a pleat, blinding the tips first, so the loaded optimum sits at a wider pitch than the clean one. Pleat stability under flow is a separate constraint and often binds before the pressure optimum does, since tall thin pleats deflect and close their own channels.
Using this calculator
About the HEPA Filter Pleat Geometry to Airflow Optimisation
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
frontalArea
Filter Frontal Area
m²
pleatHeight
Pleat Height
mm
pleatPitch
Pleat Pitch
mm
airflow
Design Airflow
m³/h
mediaResistance
Media Resistance
Pa/(cm/s)
channelCoefficient
Channel Loss Coefficient
Pa·s/m
totalPressureDrop
Total Pressure Drop
Pa
mediaArea
Media Area
m²
mediaVelocity
Media Face Velocity
cm/s
mediaPressureDrop
Media Pressure Drop
Pa
channelPressureDrop
Channel Pressure Drop
Pa
optimalPitch
Loss-Minimising Pitch
mm
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Filter Frontal Area, Pleat Height, Pleat Pitch, Design Airflow, Media Resistance and Channel Loss Coefficient.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Total Pressure Drop together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Media Area, Media Face Velocity, Media Pressure Drop, Channel Pressure Drop and Loss-Minimising Pitch — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Filter Frontal Area
m²
0.01 to 5 m²
0.36
Pleat Height
mm
5 to 400 mm
50
Pleat Pitch
mm
1 to 40 mm
4
Design Airflow
m³/h
20 to 20000 m³/h
1000
Media Resistance
Pa/(cm/s)
0.5 to 400 Pa/(cm/s)
80
Clean media pressure drop per unit face velocity.
Channel Loss Coefficient
Pa·s/m
0.001 to 5 Pa·s/m
0.06
Fitted viscous loss along the pleat channels.
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Total Pressure Drop (headline result)
Pa
Media plus channel losses at the design airflow
Media Area
m²
Media Face Velocity
cm/s
Media Pressure Drop
Pa
Channel Pressure Drop
Pa
Loss-Minimising Pitch
mm
Worked example
Given
Filter Frontal Area
0.36 m²
Pleat Height
50 mm
Pleat Pitch
4 mm
Design Airflow
1000 m³/h
Media Resistance
80 Pa/(cm/s)
Channel Loss Coefficient
0.06 Pa·s/m
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Total Pressure Drop shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Pleat Pack and Flow & Media. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Total Pressure Drop in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in Pa.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Media Area, Media Face Velocity, Media Pressure Drop, Channel Pressure Drop and Loss-Minimising Pitch) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Total Pressure Drop before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Total Pressure Drop is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Filter Frontal Area) shows how much of the gap in Total Pressure Drop each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
The channel loss coefficient is a lumped fit standing in for a real viscous-flow solution in a tapering wedge, and the optimum pitch is only as good as that fit — recover it from pressure drop measured across at least two pleat pitches on the same media before trusting the recommendation. Both terms are clean-filter values: dust loads unevenly along a pleat, blinding the tips first, so the loaded optimum sits at a wider pitch than the clean one. Pleat stability under flow is a separate constraint and often binds before the pressure optimum does, since tall thin pleats deflect and close their own channels.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Filter Frontal Area 0.01 to 5 m², Pleat Height 5 to 400 mm and Pleat Pitch 1 to 40 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the HEPA Filter Pleat Geometry to Airflow Optimisation?
Have these to hand: Filter Frontal Area, Pleat Height, Pleat Pitch, Design Airflow, Media Resistance and Channel Loss Coefficient. With those entered, the tool returns Total Pressure Drop immediately.
What exactly is Total Pressure Drop?
Media plus channel losses at the design airflow. It is reported in Pa. It is derived from Filter Frontal Area, Pleat Height, Pleat Pitch, Design Airflow, Media Resistance and Channel Loss Coefficient, and is the figure the rest of the Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Filter Frontal Area in m², Pleat Height in mm, Pleat Pitch in mm, Design Airflow in m³/h, Media Resistance in Pa/(cm/s) and Channel Loss Coefficient in Pa·s/m. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Media Area, Media Face Velocity, Media Pressure Drop, Channel Pressure Drop and Loss-Minimising Pitch. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
The channel loss coefficient is a lumped fit standing in for a real viscous-flow solution in a tapering wedge, and the optimum pitch is only as good as that fit — recover it from pressure drop measured across at least two pleat pitches on the same media before trusting the recommendation. Both terms are clean-filter values: dust loads unevenly along a pleat, blinding the tips first, so the loaded optimum sits at a wider pitch than the clean one. Pleat stability under flow is a separate constraint and often binds before the pressure optimum does, since tall thin pleats deflect and close their own channels. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.