Loom Allocation Matrix & Contribution per Machine Hour
Put this calculator on your own site
Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
The faster loom is not automatically the right one. Subtract the hourly cost and a slow cheap machine sometimes wins.
Best Contribution per Hour
—/h
From whichever machine type wins
Allocation Comparison
Air-Jet Contribution
—/h
Rapier Contribution
—/h
Advantage of Better Option
—/h
Air-Jet Output
—m/h
Rapier Output
—m/h
Width Utilisation on Best Loom
—%
Machine Hours for Order
—h
Output is the mechanical rate at 100% efficiency; multiply by the real running efficiency, which differs systematically between machine types and is often the factor that reverses the ranking. Width utilisation is reported because a narrow order on a wide loom wastes capacity rather than material — that cost is real but appears as under-recovery elsewhere, not in this margin. Style-dependent constraints decide most allocations in practice: not every construction runs on air-jet, weft colour changes and heavy or delicate yarns push work to rapier regardless of contribution, and warp changeover time is excluded here entirely.
Using this calculator
About the Loom Allocation Matrix & Contribution per Machine Hour
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Best Contribution per HourbestMarginPerHour = f( ppi, orderWidth, orderLength, fabricPrice, airJetSpeed, airJetWidth, airJetCost, rapierSpeed, rapierWidth, rapierCost )
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
ppi
Picks per Inch
PPI
orderWidth
Fabric Width
cm
orderLength
Order Length
m
fabricPrice
Fabric Contribution
/m
airJetSpeed
Air-Jet Insertion Rate
picks/min
airJetWidth
Air-Jet Reed Width
cm
airJetCost
Air-Jet Cost per Hour
/h
rapierSpeed
Rapier Insertion Rate
picks/min
rapierWidth
Rapier Reed Width
cm
rapierCost
Rapier Cost per Hour
/h
bestMarginPerHour
Best Contribution per Hour
/h
airJetMargin
Air-Jet Contribution
/h
rapierMargin
Rapier Contribution
/h
marginAdvantage
Advantage of Better Option
/h
airJetOutput
Air-Jet Output
m/h
rapierOutput
Rapier Output
m/h
widthUtilisation
Width Utilisation on Best Loom
%
hoursForOrder
Machine Hours for Order
h
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 10 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Picks per Inch, Fabric Width, Order Length, Fabric Contribution, Air-Jet Insertion Rate, Air-Jet Reed Width, Air-Jet Cost per Hour, Rapier Insertion Rate, Rapier Reed Width and Rapier Cost per Hour.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Best Contribution per Hour together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Air-Jet Contribution, Rapier Contribution, Advantage of Better Option, Air-Jet Output, Rapier Output, Width Utilisation on Best Loom and Machine Hours for Order — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Picks per Inch
PPI
5 to 300 PPI
60
Fabric Width
cm
30 to 400 cm
160
Order Length
m
50 to 500000 m
5000
Fabric Contribution
/m
0.1 to 100 /m
3.2
Selling price less material cost.
Air-Jet Insertion Rate
picks/min
200 to 2000 picks/min
900
Air-Jet Reed Width
cm
50 to 400 cm
190
Air-Jet Cost per Hour
/h
0.5 to 200 /h
12
Rapier Insertion Rate
picks/min
100 to 1200 picks/min
550
Rapier Reed Width
cm
50 to 500 cm
220
Rapier Cost per Hour
/h
0.5 to 200 /h
18
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Best Contribution per Hour (headline result)
/h
From whichever machine type wins
Air-Jet Contribution
/h
Rapier Contribution
/h
Advantage of Better Option
/h
Air-Jet Output
m/h
Rapier Output
m/h
Width Utilisation on Best Loom
%
Machine Hours for Order
h
Worked example
Given
Picks per Inch
60 PPI
Fabric Width
160 cm
Order Length
5000 m
Fabric Contribution
3.2 /m
Air-Jet Insertion Rate
900 picks/min
Air-Jet Reed Width
190 cm
Air-Jet Cost per Hour
12 /h
Rapier Insertion Rate
550 picks/min
Rapier Reed Width
220 cm
Rapier Cost per Hour
18 /h
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Best Contribution per Hour shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Order and Machine Options. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Best Contribution per Hour in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in /h.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Air-Jet Contribution, Rapier Contribution, Advantage of Better Option, Air-Jet Output, Rapier Output, Width Utilisation on Best Loom and Machine Hours for Order) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Best Contribution per Hour before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Production Planning & Sequencing are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Best Contribution per Hour is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Picks per Inch) shows how much of the gap in Best Contribution per Hour each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Production Planning & Sequencing practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Output is the mechanical rate at 100% efficiency; multiply by the real running efficiency, which differs systematically between machine types and is often the factor that reverses the ranking. Width utilisation is reported because a narrow order on a wide loom wastes capacity rather than material — that cost is real but appears as under-recovery elsewhere, not in this margin. Style-dependent constraints decide most allocations in practice: not every construction runs on air-jet, weft colour changes and heavy or delicate yarns push work to rapier regardless of contribution, and warp changeover time is excluded here entirely.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Picks per Inch 5 to 300 PPI, Fabric Width 30 to 400 cm and Order Length 50 to 500000 m, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Loom Allocation Matrix & Contribution per Machine Hour?
Have these to hand: Picks per Inch, Fabric Width, Order Length, Fabric Contribution, Air-Jet Insertion Rate, Air-Jet Reed Width, Air-Jet Cost per Hour, Rapier Insertion Rate, Rapier Reed Width and Rapier Cost per Hour. With those entered, the tool returns Best Contribution per Hour immediately.
What exactly is Best Contribution per Hour?
From whichever machine type wins. It is reported in /h. It is derived from Picks per Inch, Fabric Width, Order Length, Fabric Contribution, Air-Jet Insertion Rate, Air-Jet Reed Width, Air-Jet Cost per Hour, Rapier Insertion Rate, Rapier Reed Width and Rapier Cost per Hour, and is the figure the rest of the Production Planning & Sequencing calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Picks per Inch in PPI, Fabric Width in cm, Order Length in m, Fabric Contribution in /m, Air-Jet Insertion Rate in picks/min, Air-Jet Reed Width in cm, Air-Jet Cost per Hour in /h, Rapier Insertion Rate in picks/min, Rapier Reed Width in cm and Rapier Cost per Hour in /h. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Air-Jet Contribution, Rapier Contribution, Advantage of Better Option, Air-Jet Output, Rapier Output, Width Utilisation on Best Loom and Machine Hours for Order. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Output is the mechanical rate at 100% efficiency; multiply by the real running efficiency, which differs systematically between machine types and is often the factor that reverses the ranking. Width utilisation is reported because a narrow order on a wide loom wastes capacity rather than material — that cost is real but appears as under-recovery elsewhere, not in this margin. Style-dependent constraints decide most allocations in practice: not every construction runs on air-jet, weft colour changes and heavy or delicate yarns push work to rapier regardless of contribution, and warp changeover time is excluded here entirely. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.