Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
The mesh fixes the dose, and the viscosity that matters is the one at the blade, not the one in the pot.
Wet Paste Pick-Up
—g/m2
What actually reaches the cloth
Geometry, Deposit & Rheology
Mesh Pitch
—um
Clear Opening
—um
Open Area
—%
Theoretical Screen Volume
—cm3/m2
Dry Deposit
—g/m2
Dye Applied
—g/m2
Shear Rate at the Blade
—1/s
Apparent Viscosity at that Shear
—Pa.s
Thinning Ratio from Rest
—x
Open area is computed from a square-weave geometry, which describes a flat screen well and a rotary nickel screen only loosely - a galvanoformed rotary screen has round or hexagonal holes and its open area should be taken from the supplier specification rather than derived here. Theoretical volume is the paste the screen can hold, not the paste it delivers: transfer efficiency covers the fraction the squeegee actually pushes through and the fabric actually accepts, and it moves with squeegee pressure, blade hardness, printing speed and above all with how absorbent the ground is, so a value fitted on one construction does not transfer to another. The power-law fit describes the shear-thinning region and nothing else; it has no yield stress, so it will happily predict a finite viscosity at zero shear where a real paste has effectively infinite viscosity and does not flow at all, and that low-shear behaviour is exactly what governs whether a print bleeds after the blade has passed. Sharpness of line and bleeding are therefore not predicted here. The shear rate is a nominal blade estimate, taken as speed over film gap; the true rate varies steeply through the film and is much higher at the screen wall.
Using this calculator
About the Screen Volume, Paste Deposit & Squeegee-Shear Viscosity
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
What the mesh leaves openpitch = 10,000 / meshCount openArea = ((pitch - thread) / pitch)^2
Squared because the weave restricts in both directions. A 60/cm mesh on 80 um thread is only 27 percent open.
Cubic centimetres per square metrevolume = openArea x meshThickness
One micron of depth over a square metre is exactly one cubic centimetre, so the arithmetic needs no conversion factor at all.
Viscosity at the bladeeta = K x shearRate^(n-1) shearRate = speed / gap
At n = 0.65 and 4,400 per second the paste is nineteen times thinner than its resting value. That is the number the screen sees.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
meshCount
Mesh Count
/cm
threadDiameter
Thread Diameter
um
meshThickness
Mesh Thickness
um
transferEfficiency
Transfer Efficiency
%
pasteDensity
Paste Density
g/cm3
pasteSolids
Paste Solids
%
dyeInPaste
Dye in Paste
g/kg
consistencyIndex
Consistency Index K
Pa.s^n
flowIndex
Flow Behaviour Index n
n
squeegeeSpeed
Print Speed
m/min
filmGap
Film Gap at the Blade
mm
wetPickUp
Wet Paste Pick-Up
g/m2
meshPitch
Mesh Pitch
um
meshOpening
Clear Opening
um
openArea
Open Area
%
theoreticalVolume
Theoretical Screen Volume
cm3/m2
dryDeposit
Dry Deposit
g/m2
dyeApplied
Dye Applied
g/m2
shearRate
Shear Rate at the Blade
1/s
apparentViscosity
Apparent Viscosity at that Shear
Pa.s
thinningRatio
Thinning Ratio from Rest
x
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 11 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Mesh Count, Thread Diameter, Mesh Thickness, Transfer Efficiency, Paste Density, Paste Solids, Dye in Paste, Consistency Index K, Flow Behaviour Index n, Print Speed and Film Gap at the Blade.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Wet Paste Pick-Up together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Mesh Pitch, Clear Opening, Open Area, Theoretical Screen Volume, Dry Deposit, Dye Applied, Shear Rate at the Blade, Apparent Viscosity at that Shear and Thinning Ratio from Rest — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Mesh Count
/cm
10 to 200 /cm
60
Thread Diameter
um
10 to 400 um
80
Mesh Thickness
um
20 to 600 um
145
Including the stencil, which is what holds the paste
Transfer Efficiency
%
10 to 100 %
65
Paste Density
g/cm3
0.7 to 2 g/cm3
1.08
Paste Solids
%
1 to 60 %
12
Dye in Paste
g/kg
0.5 to 300 g/kg
30
Consistency Index K
Pa.s^n
0.1 to 200 Pa.s^n
12
Apparent viscosity at unit shear rate
Flow Behaviour Index n
n
0.1 to 1 n
0.65
Below one is shear thinning. Print pastes sit near 0.6
Print Speed
m/min
1 to 200 m/min
40
Film Gap at the Blade
mm
0.01 to 3 mm
0.15
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Wet Paste Pick-Up (headline result)
g/m2
What actually reaches the cloth
Mesh Pitch
um
Clear Opening
um
Open Area
%
Theoretical Screen Volume
cm3/m2
Dry Deposit
g/m2
Dye Applied
g/m2
Shear Rate at the Blade
1/s
Apparent Viscosity at that Shear
Pa.s
Thinning Ratio from Rest
x
Worked example
Given
Mesh Count
60 /cm
Thread Diameter
80 um
Mesh Thickness
145 um
Transfer Efficiency
65 %
Paste Density
1.08 g/cm3
Paste Solids
12 %
Dye in Paste
30 g/kg
Consistency Index K
12 Pa.s^n
Flow Behaviour Index n
0.65 n
Print Speed
40 m/min
Film Gap at the Blade
0.15 mm
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Wet Paste Pick-Up shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Screen, Paste and Squeegee. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Wet Paste Pick-Up in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in g/m2.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Mesh Pitch, Clear Opening, Open Area, Theoretical Screen Volume, Dry Deposit, Dye Applied, Shear Rate at the Blade, Apparent Viscosity at that Shear and Thinning Ratio from Rest) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Wet Paste Pick-Up before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Wet Paste Pick-Up is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Mesh Count) shows how much of the gap in Wet Paste Pick-Up each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Open area is computed from a square-weave geometry, which describes a flat screen well and a rotary nickel screen only loosely - a galvanoformed rotary screen has round or hexagonal holes and its open area should be taken from the supplier specification rather than derived here. Theoretical volume is the paste the screen can hold, not the paste it delivers: transfer efficiency covers the fraction the squeegee actually pushes through and the fabric actually accepts, and it moves with squeegee pressure, blade hardness, printing speed and above all with how absorbent the ground is, so a value fitted on one construction does not transfer to another. The power-law fit describes the shear-thinning region and nothing else; it has no yield stress, so it will happily predict a finite viscosity at zero shear where a real paste has effectively infinite viscosity and does not flow at all, and that low-shear behaviour is exactly what governs whether a print bleeds after the blade has passed. Sharpness of line and bleeding are therefore not predicted here. The shear rate is a nominal blade estimate, taken as speed over film gap; the true rate varies steeply through the film and is much higher at the screen wall.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Mesh Count 10 to 200 /cm, Thread Diameter 10 to 400 um and Mesh Thickness 20 to 600 um, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Screen Volume, Paste Deposit & Squeegee-Shear Viscosity?
Have these to hand: Mesh Count, Thread Diameter, Mesh Thickness, Transfer Efficiency, Paste Density, Paste Solids, Dye in Paste, Consistency Index K, Flow Behaviour Index n, Print Speed and Film Gap at the Blade. With those entered, the tool returns Wet Paste Pick-Up immediately.
What exactly is Wet Paste Pick-Up?
What actually reaches the cloth. It is reported in g/m2. It is derived from Mesh Count, Thread Diameter, Mesh Thickness, Transfer Efficiency, Paste Density, Paste Solids, Dye in Paste, Consistency Index K, Flow Behaviour Index n, Print Speed and Film Gap at the Blade, and is the figure the rest of the Dyeing, Printing, Color Management & Chemical Control calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Mesh Count in /cm, Thread Diameter in um, Mesh Thickness in um, Transfer Efficiency in %, Paste Density in g/cm3, Paste Solids in %, Dye in Paste in g/kg, Consistency Index K in Pa.s^n, Flow Behaviour Index n in n, Print Speed in m/min and Film Gap at the Blade in mm. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Mesh Pitch, Clear Opening, Open Area, Theoretical Screen Volume, Dry Deposit, Dye Applied, Shear Rate at the Blade, Apparent Viscosity at that Shear and Thinning Ratio from Rest. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Open area is computed from a square-weave geometry, which describes a flat screen well and a rotary nickel screen only loosely - a galvanoformed rotary screen has round or hexagonal holes and its open area should be taken from the supplier specification rather than derived here. Theoretical volume is the paste the screen can hold, not the paste it delivers: transfer efficiency covers the fraction the squeegee actually pushes through and the fabric actually accepts, and it moves with squeegee pressure, blade hardness, printing speed and above all with how absorbent the ground is, so a value fitted on one construction does not transfer to another. The power-law fit describes the shear-thinning region and nothing else; it has no yield stress, so it will happily predict a finite viscosity at zero shear where a real paste has effectively infinite viscosity and does not flow at all, and that low-shear behaviour is exactly what governs whether a print bleeds after the blade has passed. Sharpness of line and bleeding are therefore not predicted here. The shear rate is a nominal blade estimate, taken as speed over film gap; the true rate varies steeply through the film and is much higher at the screen wall. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.