Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
Aerogel insulates better than still air because a molecule in a 20 nanometre pore never gets far enough to hand its energy on.
Effective Conductivity
—W/m·K
Composite conductivity including the radiative term
Conduction Breakdown
Aerogel Phase Conductivity
—W/m·K
Suppressed Gas Conduction
—W/m·K
Knudsen Number
—×
Thermal Resistance
—m²K/W
Insulation Value
—clo
Setting aerogel and fibre fractions above 100% between them drives the air fraction negative and the result stops meaning anything — the model does not police it, so check the two add up sensibly. The structure factor is fitted, not measured: it hides all the morphology the two-bound blend cannot represent, and it must be recovered from guarded hot-plate data on the actual composite. Compression matters more than any of this — an aerogel batt at half thickness under a pack strap is a different insulator, and the model assumes the quoted thickness holds in use.
Using this calculator
About the Aerogel-Infused Fabric Thermal Conductivity Modeler
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
aerogelFraction
Aerogel Volume Fraction
%
fibreFraction
Fibre Volume Fraction
%
thickness
Fabric Thickness
mm
poreSize
Aerogel Pore Size
nm
meanFreePath
Air Mean Free Path
nm
aerogelSolidK
Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity
W/m·K
fibreK
Fibre Conductivity
W/m·K
radiativeK
Radiative Contribution
W/m·K
structureFactor
Structure Factor
×
effectiveConductivity
Effective Conductivity
W/m·K
aerogelPhaseConductivity
Aerogel Phase Conductivity
W/m·K
gasConductivity
Suppressed Gas Conduction
W/m·K
knudsenNumber
Knudsen Number
×
thermalResistance
Thermal Resistance
m²K/W
cloValue
Insulation Value
clo
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 9 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Aerogel Volume Fraction, Fibre Volume Fraction, Fabric Thickness, Aerogel Pore Size, Air Mean Free Path, Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity, Fibre Conductivity, Radiative Contribution and Structure Factor.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Effective Conductivity together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Aerogel Phase Conductivity, Suppressed Gas Conduction, Knudsen Number, Thermal Resistance and Insulation Value — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Aerogel Volume Fraction
%
0 to 90 %
35
Fibre Volume Fraction
%
1 to 80 %
25
The balance is treated as open air.
Fabric Thickness
mm
0.2 to 50 mm
3
Aerogel Pore Size
nm
2 to 500 nm
20
Air Mean Free Path
nm
20 to 200 nm
70
Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity
W/m·K
0.001 to 0.05 W/m·K
0.008
Fibre Conductivity
W/m·K
0.05 to 2 W/m·K
0.25
Radiative Contribution
W/m·K
0 to 0.05 W/m·K
0.004
Structure Factor
×
0 to 1 ×
0.35
1 is fully parallel conduction paths, 0 fully in series.
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Effective Conductivity (headline result)
W/m·K
Composite conductivity including the radiative term
Aerogel Phase Conductivity
W/m·K
Suppressed Gas Conduction
W/m·K
Knudsen Number
×
Thermal Resistance
m²K/W
Insulation Value
clo
Worked example
Given
Aerogel Volume Fraction
35 %
Fibre Volume Fraction
25 %
Fabric Thickness
3 mm
Aerogel Pore Size
20 nm
Air Mean Free Path
70 nm
Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity
0.008 W/m·K
Fibre Conductivity
0.25 W/m·K
Radiative Contribution
0.004 W/m·K
Structure Factor
0.35 ×
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Effective Conductivity shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Composition and Phase Properties. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Effective Conductivity in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in W/m·K.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Aerogel Phase Conductivity, Suppressed Gas Conduction, Knudsen Number, Thermal Resistance and Insulation Value) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Effective Conductivity before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Effective Conductivity is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Aerogel Volume Fraction) shows how much of the gap in Effective Conductivity each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Setting aerogel and fibre fractions above 100% between them drives the air fraction negative and the result stops meaning anything — the model does not police it, so check the two add up sensibly. The structure factor is fitted, not measured: it hides all the morphology the two-bound blend cannot represent, and it must be recovered from guarded hot-plate data on the actual composite. Compression matters more than any of this — an aerogel batt at half thickness under a pack strap is a different insulator, and the model assumes the quoted thickness holds in use.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Aerogel Volume Fraction 0 to 90 %, Fibre Volume Fraction 1 to 80 % and Fabric Thickness 0.2 to 50 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Aerogel-Infused Fabric Thermal Conductivity Modeler?
Have these to hand: Aerogel Volume Fraction, Fibre Volume Fraction, Fabric Thickness, Aerogel Pore Size, Air Mean Free Path, Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity, Fibre Conductivity, Radiative Contribution and Structure Factor. With those entered, the tool returns Effective Conductivity immediately.
What exactly is Effective Conductivity?
Composite conductivity including the radiative term. It is reported in W/m·K. It is derived from Aerogel Volume Fraction, Fibre Volume Fraction, Fabric Thickness, Aerogel Pore Size, Air Mean Free Path, Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity, Fibre Conductivity, Radiative Contribution and Structure Factor, and is the figure the rest of the Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Aerogel Volume Fraction in %, Fibre Volume Fraction in %, Fabric Thickness in mm, Aerogel Pore Size in nm, Air Mean Free Path in nm, Aerogel Skeleton Conductivity in W/m·K, Fibre Conductivity in W/m·K, Radiative Contribution in W/m·K and Structure Factor in ×. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Aerogel Phase Conductivity, Suppressed Gas Conduction, Knudsen Number, Thermal Resistance and Insulation Value. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Setting aerogel and fibre fractions above 100% between them drives the air fraction negative and the result stops meaning anything — the model does not police it, so check the two add up sensibly. The structure factor is fitted, not measured: it hides all the morphology the two-bound blend cannot represent, and it must be recovered from guarded hot-plate data on the actual composite. Compression matters more than any of this — an aerogel batt at half thickness under a pack strap is a different insulator, and the model assumes the quoted thickness holds in use. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.