EMI Shielding Effectiveness of Metal-Coated Fabric

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

1. The 4 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Surface Resistivity, Coating Thickness, Relative Permeability and Frequency.
2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Shielding Effectiveness together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
4. The supporting outputs — Reflection Loss, Absorption Loss, Skin Depth, Field Attenuation and Bulk Resistivity — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

Worked example

The tool loads with this case already solved — the Shielding Effectiveness shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

1. Work through the input groups in order — Conductive Layer and Threat. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
3. Read Shielding Effectiveness in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in dB.
4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Reflection Loss, Absorption Loss, Skin Depth, Field Attenuation and Bulk Resistivity) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

• Process planning — establishing Shielding Effectiveness before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
• Costing and quotation — Shielding Effectiveness is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
• Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Surface Resistivity) shows how much of the gap in Shielding Effectiveness each variable explains.
• Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

• This is the plane-wave far-field result for a continuous conductive sheet, and a fabric is not continuous — apertures at the weave, seams, closures and cable entries govern real enclosures and routinely cost tens of decibels the material itself would have delivered. Near-field magnetic shielding at low frequency follows entirely different rules and this will overstate it badly. Multiple-reflection correction is omitted, which is conservative for thick shields and optimistic where thickness is well under a skin depth. Verify by measurement to ASTM D4935 or a full enclosure test.
• Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Surface Resistivity 0.001 to 100 Ω/sq, Coating Thickness 0.05 to 200 µm and Relative Permeability 1 to 1000 µr, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
• The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
• Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask