Home » Calculators » Weaving & Fabric Formation » Weaving & Fabric Construction » Woven Fabric Reverse Engineering from GSM and Sett
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Fabric Analysis

Woven Fabric Reverse Engineering from GSM and Sett

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

A swatch, a pick glass and a balance are enough. The counts are the only unknowns the mass balance leaves.

Measured on the Swatch Balance and pick glass
g/m2
epi
ppi
Crimp & Balance What closes the system
%
%
x

One for a balanced cloth; above one means a finer weft

Derived Warp Count

— Ne

From the areal weight mass balance

Counts, Weights & Cover

Derived Weft Count
— Ne
Warp Linear Density
— tex
Weft Linear Density
— tex
Warp Contribution
— g/m2
Weft Contribution
— g/m2
Reconstructed GSM
— g/m2
Warp Share of Weight
— %
Warp Cover Factor
— K
Weft Cover Factor
— K
Cloth Cover Factor
— K

The reconstructed GSM is printed so the balance can be seen to close; it should equal the measured weight exactly, and it will, because the counts were derived from it. That is a check on the arithmetic and not on the answer. What decides the answer is the count ratio, which the mass balance cannot supply - the same weight, sett and crimp are consistent with a coarse warp and a fine weft or the reverse, and only the ratio separates them. Take it from the fabric type, from a comparable specification, or by unravelling and weighing a measured length of each in the one case where certainty is needed. Crimp is the next most sensitive input and the one most often guessed. It should be measured on threads withdrawn from the swatch and straightened under a defined tension, since guessing it wrong moves the derived counts directly, and warp and weft crimp trade against each other in a way that a single assumed pair will get wrong for any fabric not woven at ordinary tensions. The whole calculation assumes the weight is yarn: a fabric carrying a resin, a coating, a heavy softener or residual size will return counts finer than the truth, because the mass balance credits the finish to the yarn. Desize and scour before weighing where the finish is substantial.

Using this calculator

About the Woven Fabric Reverse Engineering from GSM and Sett

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Areal weight as a sum of two yarn masses
GSM = 23.25 x [ epi x (1 + Cw) / Ne_w + ppi x (1 + Cf) / Ne_f ]

The constant carries inches to metres and English count to grams per metre; everything else is sett and crimp.

Solved for the warp count
Ne_w = 23.25 x [ epi(1+Cw) + ppi(1+Cf) / r ] / GSM

With the weft count expressed as r times the warp count, the system closes and both fall out at once.

Cover factor from the derived counts
K = epi / sqrt(Ne)

Which is the check worth making: a cloth cover factor far outside 20 to 28 usually means the crimp or the ratio was wrong.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
fabricGsmFabric GSMg/m2
endsPerInchEnds per Inchepi
picksPerInchPicks per Inchppi
warpCrimpWarp Crimp%
weftCrimpWeft Crimp%
countRatioWeft Count / Warp Countx
warpCountDerived Warp CountNe
weftCountDerived Weft CountNe
warpTexWarp Linear Densitytex
weftTexWeft Linear Densitytex
warpGsmWarp Contributiong/m2
weftGsmWeft Contributiong/m2
reconstructedGsmReconstructed GSMg/m2
warpShareWarp Share of Weight%
warpCoverFactorWarp Cover FactorK
weftCoverFactorWeft Cover FactorK
clothCoverFactorCloth Cover FactorK

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Fabric GSM, Ends per Inch, Picks per Inch, Warp Crimp, Weft Crimp and Weft Count / Warp Count.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Derived Warp Count together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Derived Weft Count, Warp Linear Density, Weft Linear Density, Warp Contribution, Weft Contribution, Reconstructed GSM, Warp Share of Weight, Warp Cover Factor, Weft Cover Factor and Cloth Cover Factor — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Fabric GSMg/m220 to 900 g/m2210
Ends per Inchepi10 to 400 epi110
Picks per Inchppi10 to 400 ppi78
Warp Crimp%0 to 40 %8
Weft Crimp%0 to 40 %5
Weft Count / Warp Countx0.2 to 5 x1One for a balanced cloth; above one means a finer weft

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Derived Warp Count (headline result)NeFrom the areal weight mass balance
Derived Weft CountNe
Warp Linear Densitytex
Weft Linear Densitytex
Warp Contributiong/m2
Weft Contributiong/m2
Reconstructed GSMg/m2
Warp Share of Weight%
Warp Cover FactorK
Weft Cover FactorK
Cloth Cover FactorK

Worked example

Given

Fabric GSM
210 g/m2
Ends per Inch
110 epi
Picks per Inch
78 ppi
Warp Crimp
8 %
Weft Crimp
5 %
Weft Count / Warp Count
1 x

The tool loads with this case already solved — the Derived Warp Count shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Measured on the Swatch and Crimp & Balance. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Derived Warp Count in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in Ne.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Derived Weft Count, Warp Linear Density, Weft Linear Density, Warp Contribution, Weft Contribution, Reconstructed GSM, Warp Share of Weight, Warp Cover Factor, Weft Cover Factor and Cloth Cover Factor) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Derived Warp Count before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Weaving & Fabric Construction are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Derived Warp Count is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Fabric GSM) shows how much of the gap in Derived Warp Count each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Weaving & Fabric Construction practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

  • The reconstructed GSM is printed so the balance can be seen to close; it should equal the measured weight exactly, and it will, because the counts were derived from it. That is a check on the arithmetic and not on the answer. What decides the answer is the count ratio, which the mass balance cannot supply - the same weight, sett and crimp are consistent with a coarse warp and a fine weft or the reverse, and only the ratio separates them. Take it from the fabric type, from a comparable specification, or by unravelling and weighing a measured length of each in the one case where certainty is needed. Crimp is the next most sensitive input and the one most often guessed. It should be measured on threads withdrawn from the swatch and straightened under a defined tension, since guessing it wrong moves the derived counts directly, and warp and weft crimp trade against each other in a way that a single assumed pair will get wrong for any fabric not woven at ordinary tensions. The whole calculation assumes the weight is yarn: a fabric carrying a resin, a coating, a heavy softener or residual size will return counts finer than the truth, because the mass balance credits the finish to the yarn. Desize and scour before weighing where the finish is substantial.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Fabric GSM 20 to 900 g/m2, Ends per Inch 10 to 400 epi and Picks per Inch 10 to 400 ppi, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask

What do I need to know before using the Woven Fabric Reverse Engineering from GSM and Sett?

Have these to hand: Fabric GSM, Ends per Inch, Picks per Inch, Warp Crimp, Weft Crimp and Weft Count / Warp Count. With those entered, the tool returns Derived Warp Count immediately.

What exactly is Derived Warp Count?

From the areal weight mass balance. It is reported in Ne. It is derived from Fabric GSM, Ends per Inch, Picks per Inch, Warp Crimp, Weft Crimp and Weft Count / Warp Count, and is the figure the rest of the Weaving & Fabric Construction calculation is built around.

Which units does this calculator expect?

Enter Fabric GSM in g/m2, Ends per Inch in epi, Picks per Inch in ppi, Warp Crimp in %, Weft Crimp in % and Weft Count / Warp Count in x. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.

What are the other figures under the main result?

They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Derived Weft Count, Warp Linear Density, Weft Linear Density, Warp Contribution, Weft Contribution, Reconstructed GSM, Warp Share of Weight, Warp Cover Factor, Weft Cover Factor and Cloth Cover Factor. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.

Can I rely on this for a production decision?

The reconstructed GSM is printed so the balance can be seen to close; it should equal the measured weight exactly, and it will, because the counts were derived from it. That is a check on the arithmetic and not on the answer. What decides the answer is the count ratio, which the mass balance cannot supply - the same weight, sett and crimp are consistent with a coarse warp and a fine weft or the reverse, and only the ratio separates them. Take it from the fabric type, from a comparable specification, or by unravelling and weighing a measured length of each in the one case where certainty is needed. Crimp is the next most sensitive input and the one most often guessed. It should be measured on threads withdrawn from the swatch and straightened under a defined tension, since guessing it wrong moves the derived counts directly, and warp and weft crimp trade against each other in a way that a single assumed pair will get wrong for any fabric not woven at ordinary tensions. The whole calculation assumes the weight is yarn: a fabric carrying a resin, a coating, a heavy softener or residual size will return counts finer than the truth, because the mass balance credits the finish to the yarn. Desize and scour before weighing where the finish is substantial. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.

Scroll to Top