Home » Calculators » Nonwovens & Technical Webs » Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs » Meltblown Air-to-Polymer Ratio & Fibre Diameter
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Nonwovens

Meltblown Air-to-Polymer Ratio & Fibre Diameter

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Fibre diameter is set by the air spent per gram of polymer. Push throughput without the blower and the web coarsens.

Die & Throughput Polymer side
m
/inch

Capillaries per inch of die length

g/hole/min

The figure the process is actually specified on

Process Air Which does the attenuating
Nm3/min
kg/Nm3
kWh/kg

Electrical energy per kilogram of air delivered

Attenuation & Web Calibration and line
kg/kg

Ratio at which the reference diameter was measured

um
n

How hard diameter responds to the ratio. Half is the usual working value

m
m/min

Air-to-Polymer Ratio

— kg/kg

The number that sets fibre diameter

Output, Fibre & Energy

Capillaries in the Die
— nos
Polymer Throughput
— kg/h
Throughput per Metre of Die
— kg/h/m
Process Air Mass Flow
— kg/h
Estimated Fibre Diameter
— um
Web Basis Weight
— g/m2
Web Produced
— m2/h
Air per kg of Polymer
— kg/kg
Blower Duty
— kW

The diameter relation is a calibrated power law, not a first-principles attenuation model: real drawdown depends on air velocity and temperature at the nosepiece, polymer melt-flow index, melt temperature and die-to-collector distance, none of which appear here. Fit the reference pair on the line being modelled and the tool will track a change in ratio faithfully; take the reference from a textbook and it will not. Air-to-polymer ratio is computed on mass, which is the comparable basis across lines running different air temperatures - a volumetric ratio quoted at one temperature means something different at another, and comparing two lines on volume is a common way to reach a wrong conclusion. Basis weight assumes all extruded polymer lands on the collector inside the working width, so it ignores edge trim and any shot or fly extracted, both of which are real and both of which make the delivered web lighter than this figure. Blower duty is a first estimate from a specific-energy figure and covers the process air only; die heating, quench and the extruder are additional, but on a meltblown line they are the minority of the load, which is the point worth carrying away.

Using this calculator

About the Meltblown Air-to-Polymer Ratio & Fibre Diameter

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

From hole density to output
holes = holesPerInch x dieWidth x 39.37 polymer = throughputPerHole x holes

Throughput per hole is the figure meltblown processes are specified on, because it is what scales across die widths.

Air spent per gram of polymer
ratio = airMassFlow / polymerMassFlow

On mass, not volume, so lines running different air temperatures remain comparable.

Attenuation as a calibrated power law
d = dRef x ( ratioRef / ratio ) ^ n

At n = 0.5, tripling the ratio takes the diameter down by a factor of 1.73. Halving it coarsens the web by the same factor.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
dieWidthDie Widthm
holesPerInchHole Density/inch
throughputPerHoleThroughput per Holeg/hole/min
airFlowProcess Air FlowNm3/min
airDensityAir Density at Normal Conditionskg/Nm3
blowerSpecificEnergyBlower Specific EnergykWh/kg
referenceRatioReference Air-to-Polymer Ratiokg/kg
referenceDiameterReference Fibre Diameterum
diameterExponentAttenuation Exponentn
webWidthWeb Width on Collectorm
lineSpeedCollector Speedm/min
airToPolymerRatioAir-to-Polymer Ratiokg/kg
holeCountCapillaries in the Dienos
polymerThroughputPolymer Throughputkg/h
throughputPerMetreDieThroughput per Metre of Diekg/h/m
airMassFlowProcess Air Mass Flowkg/h
estimatedFibreDiameterEstimated Fibre Diameterum
basisWeightWeb Basis Weightg/m2
webAreaPerHourWeb Producedm2/h
specificAirDemandAir per kg of Polymerkg/kg
blowerPowerBlower DutykW

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 11 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Die Width, Hole Density, Throughput per Hole, Process Air Flow, Air Density at Normal Conditions, Blower Specific Energy, Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratio, Reference Fibre Diameter, Attenuation Exponent, Web Width on Collector and Collector Speed.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Air-to-Polymer Ratio together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Capillaries in the Die, Polymer Throughput, Throughput per Metre of Die, Process Air Mass Flow, Estimated Fibre Diameter, Web Basis Weight, Web Produced, Air per kg of Polymer and Blower Duty — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Die Widthm0.1 to 6 m1.6
Hole Density/inch5 to 100 /inch35Capillaries per inch of die length
Throughput per Holeg/hole/min0.02 to 3 g/hole/min0.35The figure the process is actually specified on
Process Air FlowNm3/min1 to 500 Nm3/min55
Air Density at Normal Conditionskg/Nm31.1 to 1.4 kg/Nm31.293
Blower Specific EnergykWh/kg0.01 to 1 kWh/kg0.11Electrical energy per kilogram of air delivered
Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratiokg/kg5 to 300 kg/kg30Ratio at which the reference diameter was measured
Reference Fibre Diameterum0.2 to 20 um2.5
Attenuation Exponentn0.1 to 1.5 n0.5How hard diameter responds to the ratio. Half is the usual working value
Web Width on Collectorm0.1 to 6 m1.6
Collector Speedm/min1 to 400 m/min30

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Air-to-Polymer Ratio (headline result)kg/kgThe number that sets fibre diameter
Capillaries in the Dienos
Polymer Throughputkg/h
Throughput per Metre of Diekg/h/m
Process Air Mass Flowkg/h
Estimated Fibre Diameterum
Web Basis Weightg/m2
Web Producedm2/h
Air per kg of Polymerkg/kg
Blower DutykW

Worked example

Given

Die Width
1.6 m
Hole Density
35 /inch
Throughput per Hole
0.35 g/hole/min
Process Air Flow
55 Nm3/min
Air Density at Normal Conditions
1.293 kg/Nm3
Blower Specific Energy
0.11 kWh/kg
Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratio
30 kg/kg
Reference Fibre Diameter
2.5 um
Attenuation Exponent
0.5 n
Web Width on Collector
1.6 m
Collector Speed
30 m/min

The tool loads with this case already solved — the Air-to-Polymer Ratio shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Die & Throughput, Process Air and Attenuation & Web. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Air-to-Polymer Ratio in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in kg/kg.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Capillaries in the Die, Polymer Throughput, Throughput per Metre of Die, Process Air Mass Flow, Estimated Fibre Diameter, Web Basis Weight, Web Produced, Air per kg of Polymer and Blower Duty) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Air-to-Polymer Ratio before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Air-to-Polymer Ratio is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Die Width) shows how much of the gap in Air-to-Polymer Ratio each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

  • The diameter relation is a calibrated power law, not a first-principles attenuation model: real drawdown depends on air velocity and temperature at the nosepiece, polymer melt-flow index, melt temperature and die-to-collector distance, none of which appear here. Fit the reference pair on the line being modelled and the tool will track a change in ratio faithfully; take the reference from a textbook and it will not. Air-to-polymer ratio is computed on mass, which is the comparable basis across lines running different air temperatures - a volumetric ratio quoted at one temperature means something different at another, and comparing two lines on volume is a common way to reach a wrong conclusion. Basis weight assumes all extruded polymer lands on the collector inside the working width, so it ignores edge trim and any shot or fly extracted, both of which are real and both of which make the delivered web lighter than this figure. Blower duty is a first estimate from a specific-energy figure and covers the process air only; die heating, quench and the extruder are additional, but on a meltblown line they are the minority of the load, which is the point worth carrying away.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Die Width 0.1 to 6 m, Hole Density 5 to 100 /inch and Throughput per Hole 0.02 to 3 g/hole/min, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask

What do I need to know before using the Meltblown Air-to-Polymer Ratio & Fibre Diameter?

Have these to hand: Die Width, Hole Density, Throughput per Hole, Process Air Flow, Air Density at Normal Conditions, Blower Specific Energy, Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratio, Reference Fibre Diameter, Attenuation Exponent, Web Width on Collector and Collector Speed. With those entered, the tool returns Air-to-Polymer Ratio immediately.

What exactly is Air-to-Polymer Ratio?

The number that sets fibre diameter. It is reported in kg/kg. It is derived from Die Width, Hole Density, Throughput per Hole, Process Air Flow, Air Density at Normal Conditions, Blower Specific Energy, Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratio, Reference Fibre Diameter, Attenuation Exponent, Web Width on Collector and Collector Speed, and is the figure the rest of the Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs calculation is built around.

Which units does this calculator expect?

Enter Die Width in m, Hole Density in /inch, Throughput per Hole in g/hole/min, Process Air Flow in Nm3/min, Air Density at Normal Conditions in kg/Nm3, Blower Specific Energy in kWh/kg, Reference Air-to-Polymer Ratio in kg/kg, Reference Fibre Diameter in um, Attenuation Exponent in n, Web Width on Collector in m and Collector Speed in m/min. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.

What are the other figures under the main result?

They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Capillaries in the Die, Polymer Throughput, Throughput per Metre of Die, Process Air Mass Flow, Estimated Fibre Diameter, Web Basis Weight, Web Produced, Air per kg of Polymer and Blower Duty. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.

Can I rely on this for a production decision?

The diameter relation is a calibrated power law, not a first-principles attenuation model: real drawdown depends on air velocity and temperature at the nosepiece, polymer melt-flow index, melt temperature and die-to-collector distance, none of which appear here. Fit the reference pair on the line being modelled and the tool will track a change in ratio faithfully; take the reference from a textbook and it will not. Air-to-polymer ratio is computed on mass, which is the comparable basis across lines running different air temperatures - a volumetric ratio quoted at one temperature means something different at another, and comparing two lines on volume is a common way to reach a wrong conclusion. Basis weight assumes all extruded polymer lands on the collector inside the working width, so it ignores edge trim and any shot or fly extracted, both of which are real and both of which make the delivered web lighter than this figure. Blower duty is a first estimate from a specific-energy figure and covers the process air only; die heating, quench and the extruder are additional, but on a meltblown line they are the minority of the load, which is the point worth carrying away. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.

Scroll to Top