Home » Calculators » Nonwovens & Technical Webs » Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs » Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance & Quality Factor
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Nonwovens

Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance & Quality Factor

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Efficiency is always available by adding grams. Quality factor is what tells you whether the media deserved them.

Media What is in the filter
g/m2
um

Improves efficiency and resistance together, which is why it is the lever worth pulling

cm/s

The standard test condition for flat-sheet media

Calibration & Target Fitted on measured media
um.m2/g

Single-fibre capture rolled into one fitted coefficient. Fitted, not predicted

Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s

Default 0.59 is the Davies correlation with its constant refitted on N95 filtering layers (8.3 in place of 64), for polypropylene at 11% solidity, the default web of the Meltblown Pore Size tool. That tool reports this constant for any web. Replace it with a fit to your own media when you have one

%

The class the media is being designed to

Quality Factor

— 1/Pa

Capture per unit of resistance. The weight-independent figure of merit

Efficiency, Resistance & Target

Filtration Efficiency
— %
Penetration
— %
Pressure Drop
— Pa
Resistance per Gram
— Pa.m2/g
Efficiency per Gram
— %.m2/g
Basis Weight for Target
— g/m2
Extra Weight Needed
— g/m2
Pressure Drop at Target
— Pa
Resistance the Target Costs
— Pa

Two constants drive this tool and they are not the same kind of number. The resistance constant comes from a model: by default it is the Davies correlation for a polypropylene web at 11% solidity, with its leading constant refitted on measured N95 filtering layers (8.3 in place of 64, O Shaughnessy and others, 2023), which gives the same web the same pressure drop as the Meltblown Pore Size tool. Davies as published would give 4.53, about eight times more, because he built the correlation on much coarser fibres. The capture constant is fitted: no model on this page predicts it, and its default describes no particular media. The capture term is a fitted single-parameter stand-in for classical single-fibre theory, which treats interception, impaction and diffusion separately and gives each a different dependence on velocity and particle size; the fitted form reproduces the exponential shape and the direction of every lever but cannot predict the most-penetrating particle size or how efficiency shifts with it, and near that size the real curve has a minimum this model does not. Fit the two constants on measured flat-sheet data at the velocity of interest and treat the model as an interpolator rather than a predictor. Electret media break the relationship entirely: a charged web achieves efficiencies far above what its structure alone would give, loses that advantage as the charge dissipates in service or on contact with oil aerosol, and a mechanical model will therefore be badly optimistic about its life and badly pessimistic about its initial performance. Pressure drop here is clean-media resistance; loading raises it through life, and the useful life of a filter is usually set by the terminal drop rather than by efficiency. Face velocity is the flat-sheet test condition and not the face velocity of a pleated element, where the media velocity is lower than the element velocity by the pleating ratio - which is precisely why elements are pleated.

Using this calculator

About the Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance & Quality Factor

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Penetration falls exponentially with weight
P = exp( -alpha x W / d ) E = 1 - P

Each additional gram removes the same PROPORTION of what still gets through, so efficiency in log terms is linear in basis weight.

Resistance rises linearly with weight
dP = beta x W x v / d^2

And with the square of fineness in the denominator, which is why halving fibre diameter is worth so much more than doubling the weight. beta has the form of the Davies correlation folded into one number, K x air viscosity x sqrt(solidity) x (1 + 56 x solidity^3) / polymer density, with K = 64 as Davies published it and 8.3 as refitted on N95 filtering layers, so it rises slowly as the web is packed tighter.

The figure of merit
QF = -ln(P) / dP

Both numerator and denominator scale with basis weight, so it cancels: quality factor compares media, not quantities.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
basisWeightBasis Weightg/m2
fibreDiameterMean Fibre Diameterum
faceVelocityFace Velocitycm/s
efficiencyConstantCapture Constantum.m2/g
resistanceConstantResistance ConstantPa.um2.m2/g/cm/s
targetEfficiencyTarget Efficiency%
qualityFactorQuality Factor1/Pa
efficiencyFiltration Efficiency%
penetrationPenetration%
pressureDropPressure DropPa
resistancePerGramResistance per GramPa.m2/g
efficiencyPerGramEfficiency per Gram%.m2/g
weightForTargetBasis Weight for Targetg/m2
extraWeightNeededExtra Weight Neededg/m2
dropForTargetPressure Drop at TargetPa
extraDropCostResistance the Target CostsPa

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Basis Weight, Mean Fibre Diameter, Face Velocity, Capture Constant, Resistance Constant and Target Efficiency.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Quality Factor together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Filtration Efficiency, Penetration, Pressure Drop, Resistance per Gram, Efficiency per Gram, Basis Weight for Target, Extra Weight Needed, Pressure Drop at Target and Resistance the Target Costs — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Basis Weightg/m21 to 300 g/m225
Mean Fibre Diameterum0.2 to 30 um2.5Improves efficiency and resistance together, which is why it is the lever worth pulling
Face Velocitycm/s0.5 to 60 cm/s5.3The standard test condition for flat-sheet media
Capture Constantum.m2/g0.02 to 5 um.m2/g0.42Single-fibre capture rolled into one fitted coefficient. Fitted, not predicted
Resistance ConstantPa.um2.m2/g/cm/s0.02 to 10 Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s0.59Default 0.59 is the Davies correlation with its constant refitted on N95 filtering layers (8.3 in place of 64), for polypropylene at 11% solidity, the default web of the Meltblown Pore Size tool. That tool reports this constant for any web. Replace it with a fit to your own media when you have one
Target Efficiency%50 to 100 %99.97The class the media is being designed to

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Quality Factor (headline result)1/PaCapture per unit of resistance. The weight-independent figure of merit
Filtration Efficiency%
Penetration%
Pressure DropPa
Resistance per GramPa.m2/g
Efficiency per Gram%.m2/g
Basis Weight for Targetg/m2
Extra Weight Neededg/m2
Pressure Drop at TargetPa
Resistance the Target CostsPa

Worked example

Given

Basis Weight
25 g/m2
Mean Fibre Diameter
2.5 um
Face Velocity
5.3 cm/s
Capture Constant
0.42 um.m2/g
Resistance Constant
0.59 Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s
Target Efficiency
99.97 %

The tool loads with this case already solved — the Quality Factor shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Media and Calibration & Target. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Quality Factor in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in 1/Pa.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Filtration Efficiency, Penetration, Pressure Drop, Resistance per Gram, Efficiency per Gram, Basis Weight for Target, Extra Weight Needed, Pressure Drop at Target and Resistance the Target Costs) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Quality Factor before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Quality Factor is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Basis Weight) shows how much of the gap in Quality Factor each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Assumptions and limits

  • Two constants drive this tool and they are not the same kind of number. The resistance constant comes from a model: by default it is the Davies correlation for a polypropylene web at 11% solidity, with its leading constant refitted on measured N95 filtering layers (8.3 in place of 64, O Shaughnessy and others, 2023), which gives the same web the same pressure drop as the Meltblown Pore Size tool. Davies as published would give 4.53, about eight times more, because he built the correlation on much coarser fibres. The capture constant is fitted: no model on this page predicts it, and its default describes no particular media. The capture term is a fitted single-parameter stand-in for classical single-fibre theory, which treats interception, impaction and diffusion separately and gives each a different dependence on velocity and particle size; the fitted form reproduces the exponential shape and the direction of every lever but cannot predict the most-penetrating particle size or how efficiency shifts with it, and near that size the real curve has a minimum this model does not. Fit the two constants on measured flat-sheet data at the velocity of interest and treat the model as an interpolator rather than a predictor. Electret media break the relationship entirely: a charged web achieves efficiencies far above what its structure alone would give, loses that advantage as the charge dissipates in service or on contact with oil aerosol, and a mechanical model will therefore be badly optimistic about its life and badly pessimistic about its initial performance. Pressure drop here is clean-media resistance; loading raises it through life, and the useful life of a filter is usually set by the terminal drop rather than by efficiency. Face velocity is the flat-sheet test condition and not the face velocity of a pleated element, where the media velocity is lower than the element velocity by the pleating ratio - which is precisely why elements are pleated.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Basis Weight 1 to 300 g/m2, Mean Fibre Diameter 0.2 to 30 um and Face Velocity 0.5 to 60 cm/s, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Questions people ask

What do I need to know before using the Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance & Quality Factor?

Have these to hand: Basis Weight, Mean Fibre Diameter, Face Velocity, Capture Constant, Resistance Constant and Target Efficiency. With those entered, the tool returns Quality Factor immediately.

What exactly is Quality Factor?

Capture per unit of resistance. The weight-independent figure of merit. It is reported in 1/Pa. It is derived from Basis Weight, Mean Fibre Diameter, Face Velocity, Capture Constant, Resistance Constant and Target Efficiency, and is the figure the rest of the Nonwovens, Filtration, Hygiene & Technical Webs calculation is built around.

Which units does this calculator expect?

Enter Basis Weight in g/m2, Mean Fibre Diameter in um, Face Velocity in cm/s, Capture Constant in um.m2/g, Resistance Constant in Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s and Target Efficiency in %. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.

What are the other figures under the main result?

They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Filtration Efficiency, Penetration, Pressure Drop, Resistance per Gram, Efficiency per Gram, Basis Weight for Target, Extra Weight Needed, Pressure Drop at Target and Resistance the Target Costs. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.

Can I rely on this for a production decision?

Two constants drive this tool and they are not the same kind of number. The resistance constant comes from a model: by default it is the Davies correlation for a polypropylene web at 11% solidity, with its leading constant refitted on measured N95 filtering layers (8.3 in place of 64, O Shaughnessy and others, 2023), which gives the same web the same pressure drop as the Meltblown Pore Size tool. Davies as published would give 4.53, about eight times more, because he built the correlation on much coarser fibres. The capture constant is fitted: no model on this page predicts it, and its default describes no particular media. The capture term is a fitted single-parameter stand-in for classical single-fibre theory, which treats interception, impaction and diffusion separately and gives each a different dependence on velocity and particle size; the fitted form reproduces the exponential shape and the direction of every lever but cannot predict the most-penetrating particle size or how efficiency shifts with it, and near that size the real curve has a minimum this model does not. Fit the two constants on measured flat-sheet data at the velocity of interest and treat the model as an interpolator rather than a predictor. Electret media break the relationship entirely: a charged web achieves efficiencies far above what its structure alone would give, loses that advantage as the charge dissipates in service or on contact with oil aerosol, and a mechanical model will therefore be badly optimistic about its life and badly pessimistic about its initial performance. Pressure drop here is clean-media resistance; loading raises it through life, and the useful life of a filter is usually set by the terminal drop rather than by efficiency. Face velocity is the flat-sheet test condition and not the face velocity of a pleated element, where the media velocity is lower than the element velocity by the pleating ratio - which is precisely why elements are pleated. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.

Scroll to Top