Meltblown Pore Size & Filtration Pressure Drop Modeler
Put this calculator on your own site
Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
Pore size is not a property of the fibre — it is a property of how tightly the fibres are packed. Two webs of identical fibre can filter completely differently.
Mean Pore Size
—µm
Wrotnowski model for randomly laid cylindrical fibres
Media Properties
Web Solidity
—%
Pressure Drop, Davies (1953)
—Pa
Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media
—Pa
Specific Surface Area
—m²/g
Fibre Length
—km/m²
Porosity
—%
Resistance Constant, Recalibrated
—Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s
Pressure drop is given two ways. The Davies figure is his 1953 correlation as published, computed from the solidity and fibre diameter above with no fitted constant; he built it on media with fibres far coarser than meltblown. Refitted to six N95 filtering layers with fibres of about 2.5 µm, the same correlation needed its leading constant cut from 64 to 8.3 (O Shaughnessy and others, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2023), so the recalibrated figure is the closer guide for fine meltblown and the Davies figure an upper estimate. The recalibrated resistance constant is that figure in the form the Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance and Quality Factor tool takes, so the two tools agree when it is carried across. Pressure drop is mechanical only; it says nothing about the electret charge that carries most of the efficiency in respirator media, and charge decays. Respiratory protection is decision-support only — certification requires testing to the applicable standard.
Using this calculator
About the Meltblown Pore Size & Filtration Pressure Drop Modeler
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
fibreDiameter
Mean Fibre Diameter
µm
basisWeight
Basis Weight
g/m²
thickness
Web Thickness
mm
polymerDensity
Polymer Density
g/cm³
faceVelocity
Face Velocity
m/s
airViscosity
Air Viscosity
µPa·s
meanPoreSize
Mean Pore Size
µm
solidity
Web Solidity
%
pressureDrop
Pressure Drop, Davies (1953)
Pa
pressureDropN95
Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media
Pa
specificSurface
Specific Surface Area
m²/g
fibreLength
Fibre Length
km/m²
porosity
Porosity
%
resistanceConstant
Resistance Constant, Recalibrated
Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Mean Fibre Diameter, Basis Weight, Web Thickness, Polymer Density, Face Velocity and Air Viscosity.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Mean Pore Size together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Web Solidity, Pressure Drop, Davies (1953), Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media, Specific Surface Area, Fibre Length, Porosity and Resistance Constant, Recalibrated — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Mean Fibre Diameter
µm
0.1 to 50 µm
2
Basis Weight
g/m²
1 to 500 g/m²
25
Web Thickness
mm
0.01 to 20 mm
0.25
Polymer Density
g/cm³
0.5 to 3 g/cm³
0.91
Polypropylene 0.91, PET 1.38.
Face Velocity
m/s
0.001 to 5 m/s
0.053
0.053 m/s is 32 L/min through 100 cm². A whole N95 respirator tested at 85 L/min sees about 0.08 m/s at its filter.
Air Viscosity
µPa·s
5 to 50 µPa·s
18.1
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Mean Pore Size (headline result)
µm
Wrotnowski model for randomly laid cylindrical fibres
Web Solidity
%
Pressure Drop, Davies (1953)
Pa
Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media
Pa
Specific Surface Area
m²/g
Fibre Length
km/m²
Porosity
%
Resistance Constant, Recalibrated
Pa.um2.m2/g/cm/s
Worked example
Given
Mean Fibre Diameter
2 µm
Basis Weight
25 g/m²
Web Thickness
0.25 mm
Polymer Density
0.91 g/cm³
Face Velocity
0.053 m/s
Air Viscosity
18.1 µPa·s
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Mean Pore Size shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Web and Test Condition. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Mean Pore Size in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in µm.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Web Solidity, Pressure Drop, Davies (1953), Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media, Specific Surface Area, Fibre Length, Porosity and Resistance Constant, Recalibrated) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Mean Pore Size before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Nonwovens & Technical Textiles are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Mean Pore Size is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Mean Fibre Diameter) shows how much of the gap in Mean Pore Size each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Nonwovens & Technical Textiles practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Pressure drop is given two ways. The Davies figure is his 1953 correlation as published, computed from the solidity and fibre diameter above with no fitted constant; he built it on media with fibres far coarser than meltblown. Refitted to six N95 filtering layers with fibres of about 2.5 µm, the same correlation needed its leading constant cut from 64 to 8.3 (O Shaughnessy and others, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2023), so the recalibrated figure is the closer guide for fine meltblown and the Davies figure an upper estimate. The recalibrated resistance constant is that figure in the form the Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance and Quality Factor tool takes, so the two tools agree when it is carried across. Pressure drop is mechanical only; it says nothing about the electret charge that carries most of the efficiency in respirator media, and charge decays. Respiratory protection is decision-support only — certification requires testing to the applicable standard.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Mean Fibre Diameter 0.1 to 50 µm, Basis Weight 1 to 500 g/m² and Web Thickness 0.01 to 20 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Meltblown Pore Size & Filtration Pressure Drop Modeler?
Have these to hand: Mean Fibre Diameter, Basis Weight, Web Thickness, Polymer Density, Face Velocity and Air Viscosity. With those entered, the tool returns Mean Pore Size immediately.
What exactly is Mean Pore Size?
Wrotnowski model for randomly laid cylindrical fibres. It is reported in µm. It is derived from Mean Fibre Diameter, Basis Weight, Web Thickness, Polymer Density, Face Velocity and Air Viscosity, and is the figure the rest of the Nonwovens & Technical Textiles calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Mean Fibre Diameter in µm, Basis Weight in g/m², Web Thickness in mm, Polymer Density in g/cm³, Face Velocity in m/s and Air Viscosity in µPa·s. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Web Solidity, Pressure Drop, Davies (1953), Pressure Drop, Recalibrated on N95 Media, Specific Surface Area, Fibre Length, Porosity and Resistance Constant, Recalibrated. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Pressure drop is given two ways. The Davies figure is his 1953 correlation as published, computed from the solidity and fibre diameter above with no fitted constant; he built it on media with fibres far coarser than meltblown. Refitted to six N95 filtering layers with fibres of about 2.5 µm, the same correlation needed its leading constant cut from 64 to 8.3 (O Shaughnessy and others, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2023), so the recalibrated figure is the closer guide for fine meltblown and the Davies figure an upper estimate. The recalibrated resistance constant is that figure in the form the Filter Media Efficiency, Resistance and Quality Factor tool takes, so the two tools agree when it is carried across. Pressure drop is mechanical only; it says nothing about the electret charge that carries most of the efficiency in respirator media, and charge decays. Respiratory protection is decision-support only — certification requires testing to the applicable standard. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.