PTFE Membrane Gas Permeation Rate & Enrichment Calculator
Put this calculator on your own site
Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
Thinner membrane, more flow, identical selectivity. Throughput is cheap to buy; purity is the part that costs.
Permeate Flow
—m³/h
Volumetric throughput across the whole membrane area
Permeation & Purity
Permeance
—GPU
Specific Flux
—m³/m²·h
Driving Force
—cmHg
Permeate Purity
—%
Enrichment Factor
—×
Purity here is the limiting case at vanishing stage cut, where the permeate is drawn so slowly that the feed composition never changes — it is the best a single stage can do and real modules operating at useful recovery fall short of it. The calculation also assumes the permeate side is swept to negligible partial pressure; without that the driving force collapses as the permeate accumulates. Concentration polarisation and plasticisation at high pressure both reduce real performance further, and permeability itself is temperature dependent, so quote the temperature with any Barrer figure.
Using this calculator
About the PTFE Membrane Gas Permeation Rate & Enrichment Calculator
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
permeability
Permeability
Barrer
thickness
Active Layer Thickness
µm
membraneArea
Membrane Area
m²
selectivity
Selectivity
×
pressureDifference
Partial Pressure Difference
bar
feedFraction
Fast Gas in Feed
%
permeateFlow
Permeate Flow
m³/h
permeance
Permeance
GPU
specificFlux
Specific Flux
m³/m²·h
drivingForce
Driving Force
cmHg
permeatePurity
Permeate Purity
%
enrichmentFactor
Enrichment Factor
×
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Permeability, Active Layer Thickness, Membrane Area, Selectivity, Partial Pressure Difference and Fast Gas in Feed.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Permeate Flow together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Permeance, Specific Flux, Driving Force, Permeate Purity and Enrichment Factor — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Permeability
Barrer
1 to 20000 Barrer
1500
Active Layer Thickness
µm
0.1 to 500 µm
25
Membrane Area
m²
0.01 to 5000 m²
10
Selectivity
×
1 to 100 ×
2
Ratio of permeability between the fast and slow gas.
Partial Pressure Difference
bar
0.05 to 60 bar
2
Fast Gas in Feed
%
0.1 to 99 %
21
21% for oxygen in air.
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Permeate Flow (headline result)
m³/h
Volumetric throughput across the whole membrane area
Permeance
GPU
Specific Flux
m³/m²·h
Driving Force
cmHg
Permeate Purity
%
Enrichment Factor
×
Worked example
Given
Permeability
1500 Barrer
Active Layer Thickness
25 µm
Membrane Area
10 m²
Selectivity
2 ×
Partial Pressure Difference
2 bar
Fast Gas in Feed
21 %
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Permeate Flow shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Membrane and Process. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Permeate Flow in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in m³/h.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Permeance, Specific Flux, Driving Force, Permeate Purity and Enrichment Factor) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Permeate Flow before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Permeate Flow is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Permeability) shows how much of the gap in Permeate Flow each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Purity here is the limiting case at vanishing stage cut, where the permeate is drawn so slowly that the feed composition never changes — it is the best a single stage can do and real modules operating at useful recovery fall short of it. The calculation also assumes the permeate side is swept to negligible partial pressure; without that the driving force collapses as the permeate accumulates. Concentration polarisation and plasticisation at high pressure both reduce real performance further, and permeability itself is temperature dependent, so quote the temperature with any Barrer figure.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Permeability 1 to 20000 Barrer, Active Layer Thickness 0.1 to 500 µm and Membrane Area 0.01 to 5000 m², and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the PTFE Membrane Gas Permeation Rate & Enrichment Calculator?
Have these to hand: Permeability, Active Layer Thickness, Membrane Area, Selectivity, Partial Pressure Difference and Fast Gas in Feed. With those entered, the tool returns Permeate Flow immediately.
What exactly is Permeate Flow?
Volumetric throughput across the whole membrane area. It is reported in m³/h. It is derived from Permeability, Active Layer Thickness, Membrane Area, Selectivity, Partial Pressure Difference and Fast Gas in Feed, and is the figure the rest of the Filtration, Separation & Gas Dynamics calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Permeability in Barrer, Active Layer Thickness in µm, Membrane Area in m², Selectivity in ×, Partial Pressure Difference in bar and Fast Gas in Feed in %. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Permeance, Specific Flux, Driving Force, Permeate Purity and Enrichment Factor. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Purity here is the limiting case at vanishing stage cut, where the permeate is drawn so slowly that the feed composition never changes — it is the best a single stage can do and real modules operating at useful recovery fall short of it. The calculation also assumes the permeate side is swept to negligible partial pressure; without that the driving force collapses as the permeate accumulates. Concentration polarisation and plasticisation at high pressure both reduce real performance further, and permeability itself is temperature dependent, so quote the temperature with any Barrer figure. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.