Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
The substrate is the antenna. Sit on a felt-backed patch and the permittivity rises, the resonance moves, and the link budget goes with it.
Patch Length
—mm
Resonant dimension including the fringing correction
Antenna Geometry
Patch Width
—mm
Effective Permittivity
—εeff
Fringing Extension
—mm
Fractional Bandwidth
—%
Bandwidth
—MHz
Shift Under Compression
—MHz
Compare the compression shift against the bandwidth: if the shift is a large fraction of it, the antenna will not survive being worn, and no amount of matching at the bench will fix that. The transmission-line model used here is quick and approximate — it ignores the ground plane size, the feed and the human body underneath, and a body at a few millimetres both detunes the patch and absorbs a large share of its radiated power. Moisture is the other uncontrolled variable, since a damp substrate has a materially higher permittivity and loss than a dry one. Confirm on a vector network analyser with the antenna on a phantom, not in free space.
Using this calculator
About the Wearable Antenna Fabric Permittivity & Patch Dimensions
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
dielectricConstant
Dielectric Constant
εr
substrateThickness
Substrate Thickness
mm
compressionStrain
Compression Under Body Load
%
targetFrequency
Design Frequency
GHz
patchLength
Patch Length
mm
patchWidth
Patch Width
mm
effectivePermittivity
Effective Permittivity
εeff
fringingExtension
Fringing Extension
mm
fractionalBandwidth
Fractional Bandwidth
%
bandwidth
Bandwidth
MHz
frequencyShift
Shift Under Compression
MHz
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 4 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Dielectric Constant, Substrate Thickness, Compression Under Body Load and Design Frequency.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Patch Length together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Patch Width, Effective Permittivity, Fringing Extension, Fractional Bandwidth, Bandwidth and Shift Under Compression — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Dielectric Constant
εr
1.05 to 6 εr
1.45
About 1.2 for open foam, 1.45 for felt, 2 to 3 for dense woven.
Substrate Thickness
mm
0.2 to 15 mm
3
Compression Under Body Load
%
0 to 70 %
15
Design Frequency
GHz
0.4 to 10 GHz
2.45
0.868 for RFID, 2.45 for Bluetooth and WLAN.
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Patch Length (headline result)
mm
Resonant dimension including the fringing correction
Patch Width
mm
Effective Permittivity
εeff
Fringing Extension
mm
Fractional Bandwidth
%
Bandwidth
MHz
Shift Under Compression
MHz
Worked example
Given
Dielectric Constant
1.45 εr
Substrate Thickness
3 mm
Compression Under Body Load
15 %
Design Frequency
2.45 GHz
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Patch Length shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Substrate and Target Link. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Patch Length in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in mm.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Patch Width, Effective Permittivity, Fringing Extension, Fractional Bandwidth, Bandwidth and Shift Under Compression) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Patch Length before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in E-Textiles, Smart Wearables & Biomimetics are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Patch Length is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Dielectric Constant) shows how much of the gap in Patch Length each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal E-Textiles, Smart Wearables & Biomimetics practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Compare the compression shift against the bandwidth: if the shift is a large fraction of it, the antenna will not survive being worn, and no amount of matching at the bench will fix that. The transmission-line model used here is quick and approximate — it ignores the ground plane size, the feed and the human body underneath, and a body at a few millimetres both detunes the patch and absorbs a large share of its radiated power. Moisture is the other uncontrolled variable, since a damp substrate has a materially higher permittivity and loss than a dry one. Confirm on a vector network analyser with the antenna on a phantom, not in free space.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Dielectric Constant 1.05 to 6 εr, Substrate Thickness 0.2 to 15 mm and Compression Under Body Load 0 to 70 %, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Wearable Antenna Fabric Permittivity & Patch Dimensions?
Have these to hand: Dielectric Constant, Substrate Thickness, Compression Under Body Load and Design Frequency. With those entered, the tool returns Patch Length immediately.
What exactly is Patch Length?
Resonant dimension including the fringing correction. It is reported in mm. It is derived from Dielectric Constant, Substrate Thickness, Compression Under Body Load and Design Frequency, and is the figure the rest of the E-Textiles, Smart Wearables & Biomimetics calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Dielectric Constant in εr, Substrate Thickness in mm, Compression Under Body Load in % and Design Frequency in GHz. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Patch Width, Effective Permittivity, Fringing Extension, Fractional Bandwidth, Bandwidth and Shift Under Compression. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Compare the compression shift against the bandwidth: if the shift is a large fraction of it, the antenna will not survive being worn, and no amount of matching at the bench will fix that. The transmission-line model used here is quick and approximate — it ignores the ground plane size, the feed and the human body underneath, and a body at a few millimetres both detunes the patch and absorbs a large share of its radiated power. Moisture is the other uncontrolled variable, since a damp substrate has a materially higher permittivity and loss than a dry one. Confirm on a vector network analyser with the antenna on a phantom, not in free space. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.