Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
The same 50 mm of polyester absorbs twice as well hung 50 mm off the wall. Air against a hard surface is not moving, and stationary air cannot be damped.
Absorption Coefficient
—α
Normal-incidence absorption at the chosen frequency
Absorber Behaviour
Flow Resistivity
—Pa·s/m²
Normalised Resistance
—×
Cavity Reactance
—×
Quarter-Wave Peak
—Hz
Absorption per Panel
—sabins
This is the thin resistive sheet idealisation: the panel is treated as a lumped resistance at the face of the cavity, which holds while the panel is thin against the wavelength and understates absorption for thick panels at high frequency, where the material is better modelled as a bulk propagating medium. The Bies and Hansen resistivity fit was established for glass and mineral fibre and carries real scatter on polyester. Reactance runs to infinity at multiples of the half wavelength, where this model correctly predicts nothing is absorbed — those nulls are real but shallower in practice than the formula shows.
Using this calculator
About the Nonwoven Acoustic Baffle Absorption & Flow Resistivity
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
fibreDiameter
Fibre Diameter
µm
bulkDensity
Bulk Density
kg/m³
thickness
Panel Thickness
mm
panelArea
Panel Area
m²
airGap
Air Gap Behind Panel
mm
frequency
Frequency of Interest
Hz
absorptionCoefficient
Absorption Coefficient
α
flowResistivity
Flow Resistivity
Pa·s/m²
normalisedResistance
Normalised Resistance
×
cavityReactance
Cavity Reactance
×
quarterWaveFrequency
Quarter-Wave Peak
Hz
panelAbsorption
Absorption per Panel
sabins
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Fibre Diameter, Bulk Density, Panel Thickness, Panel Area, Air Gap Behind Panel and Frequency of Interest.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Absorption Coefficient together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Flow Resistivity, Normalised Resistance, Cavity Reactance, Quarter-Wave Peak and Absorption per Panel — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Fibre Diameter
µm
1 to 80 µm
15
Bulk Density
kg/m³
5 to 200 kg/m³
30
Panel Thickness
mm
5 to 300 mm
50
Panel Area
m²
0.1 to 100 m²
1.2
Air Gap Behind Panel
mm
0 to 500 mm
50
Frequency of Interest
Hz
63 to 8000 Hz
500
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Absorption Coefficient (headline result)
α
Normal-incidence absorption at the chosen frequency
Flow Resistivity
Pa·s/m²
Normalised Resistance
×
Cavity Reactance
×
Quarter-Wave Peak
Hz
Absorption per Panel
sabins
Worked example
Given
Fibre Diameter
15 µm
Bulk Density
30 kg/m³
Panel Thickness
50 mm
Panel Area
1.2 m²
Air Gap Behind Panel
50 mm
Frequency of Interest
500 Hz
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Absorption Coefficient shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Panel Construction and Mounting & Frequency. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Absorption Coefficient in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in α.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Flow Resistivity, Normalised Resistance, Cavity Reactance, Quarter-Wave Peak and Absorption per Panel) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Absorption Coefficient before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Absorption Coefficient is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Fibre Diameter) shows how much of the gap in Absorption Coefficient each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
This is the thin resistive sheet idealisation: the panel is treated as a lumped resistance at the face of the cavity, which holds while the panel is thin against the wavelength and understates absorption for thick panels at high frequency, where the material is better modelled as a bulk propagating medium. The Bies and Hansen resistivity fit was established for glass and mineral fibre and carries real scatter on polyester. Reactance runs to infinity at multiples of the half wavelength, where this model correctly predicts nothing is absorbed — those nulls are real but shallower in practice than the formula shows.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Fibre Diameter 1 to 80 µm, Bulk Density 5 to 200 kg/m³ and Panel Thickness 5 to 300 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Nonwoven Acoustic Baffle Absorption & Flow Resistivity?
Have these to hand: Fibre Diameter, Bulk Density, Panel Thickness, Panel Area, Air Gap Behind Panel and Frequency of Interest. With those entered, the tool returns Absorption Coefficient immediately.
What exactly is Absorption Coefficient?
Normal-incidence absorption at the chosen frequency. It is reported in α. It is derived from Fibre Diameter, Bulk Density, Panel Thickness, Panel Area, Air Gap Behind Panel and Frequency of Interest, and is the figure the rest of the Acoustic, Thermal & Metamaterial Textiles calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Fibre Diameter in µm, Bulk Density in kg/m³, Panel Thickness in mm, Panel Area in m², Air Gap Behind Panel in mm and Frequency of Interest in Hz. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Flow Resistivity, Normalised Resistance, Cavity Reactance, Quarter-Wave Peak and Absorption per Panel. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
This is the thin resistive sheet idealisation: the panel is treated as a lumped resistance at the face of the cavity, which holds while the panel is thin against the wavelength and understates absorption for thick panels at high frequency, where the material is better modelled as a bulk propagating medium. The Bies and Hansen resistivity fit was established for glass and mineral fibre and carries real scatter on polyester. Reactance runs to infinity at multiples of the half wavelength, where this model correctly predicts nothing is absorbed — those nulls are real but shallower in practice than the formula shows. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.