Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
Thin air evaporates sweat faster, not slower. At 8,000 m the garment is rarely the limit — the climber's water is.
Evaporative Capacity
—g/h
Sweat the garment can move at these conditions
Moisture Balance
Ambient Pressure
—kPa
Vapour Pressure Difference
—kPa
Pressure-Corrected Ret
—m²Pa/W
Evaporative Flux
—W/m²
Required Sweat Rate
—g/h
Capacity vs Requirement
—×
A capacity ratio comfortably above one is not good news here — it means the climber is losing water at the full metabolic rate into air that will take all of it, and respiratory loss at altitude adds substantially more on top. The pressure correction applies only to the air-layer share of Ret; a membrane's own resistance is a material property and does not change with altitude, so that split has to be right or the answer is not. The model also assumes a fully wetted skin at steady state and ignores condensation and freezing within the insulation, which is the actual failure mode of multi-day cold-weather clothing. High-altitude physiology is medical territory and this is a clothing calculation, not physiological guidance.
Using this calculator
About the High-Altitude Suit Hypobaric Moisture Transport
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
altitude
Altitude
m
ambientTemp
Ambient Temperature
°C
ambientHumidity
Ambient Relative Humidity
%
skinTemp
Skin Temperature
°C
fabricRet
Evaporative Resistance
m²Pa/W
diffusionFraction
Air-Layer Share of Resistance
%
bodyArea
Body Surface Area
m²
metabolicHeat
Metabolic Heat Output
W
evaporativeFraction
Heat Lost by Evaporation
%
evaporativeCapacity
Evaporative Capacity
g/h
ambientPressure
Ambient Pressure
kPa
vapourPressureDifference
Vapour Pressure Difference
kPa
correctedRet
Pressure-Corrected Ret
m²Pa/W
evaporativeFlux
Evaporative Flux
W/m²
requiredSweatRate
Required Sweat Rate
g/h
capacityRatio
Capacity vs Requirement
×
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 9 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Altitude, Ambient Temperature, Ambient Relative Humidity, Skin Temperature, Evaporative Resistance, Air-Layer Share of Resistance, Body Surface Area, Metabolic Heat Output and Heat Lost by Evaporation.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Evaporative Capacity together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Ambient Pressure, Vapour Pressure Difference, Pressure-Corrected Ret, Evaporative Flux, Required Sweat Rate and Capacity vs Requirement — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Altitude
m
0 to 9000 m
8000
Ambient Temperature
°C
-60 to 30 °C
-30
Ambient Relative Humidity
%
1 to 100 %
40
Skin Temperature
°C
20 to 40 °C
33
Evaporative Resistance
m²Pa/W
1 to 120 m²Pa/W
20
Measured at sea level on a sweating guarded hotplate.
Air-Layer Share of Resistance
%
0 to 90 %
40
Only this share scales with pressure; the membrane share does not.
Body Surface Area
m²
1 to 2.5 m²
1.8
Metabolic Heat Output
W
80 to 900 W
400
Heat Lost by Evaporation
%
10 to 95 %
60
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Evaporative Capacity (headline result)
g/h
Sweat the garment can move at these conditions
Ambient Pressure
kPa
Vapour Pressure Difference
kPa
Pressure-Corrected Ret
m²Pa/W
Evaporative Flux
W/m²
Required Sweat Rate
g/h
Capacity vs Requirement
×
Worked example
Given
Altitude
8000 m
Ambient Temperature
-30 °C
Ambient Relative Humidity
40 %
Skin Temperature
33 °C
Evaporative Resistance
20 m²Pa/W
Air-Layer Share of Resistance
40 %
Body Surface Area
1.8 m²
Metabolic Heat Output
400 W
Heat Lost by Evaporation
60 %
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Evaporative Capacity shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Environment and Garment & Climber. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Evaporative Capacity in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in g/h.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Ambient Pressure, Vapour Pressure Difference, Pressure-Corrected Ret, Evaporative Flux, Required Sweat Rate and Capacity vs Requirement) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Evaporative Capacity before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in High-Performance Sports & Extreme Environments are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Evaporative Capacity is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Altitude) shows how much of the gap in Evaporative Capacity each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal High-Performance Sports & Extreme Environments practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
A capacity ratio comfortably above one is not good news here — it means the climber is losing water at the full metabolic rate into air that will take all of it, and respiratory loss at altitude adds substantially more on top. The pressure correction applies only to the air-layer share of Ret; a membrane's own resistance is a material property and does not change with altitude, so that split has to be right or the answer is not. The model also assumes a fully wetted skin at steady state and ignores condensation and freezing within the insulation, which is the actual failure mode of multi-day cold-weather clothing. High-altitude physiology is medical territory and this is a clothing calculation, not physiological guidance.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Altitude 0 to 9000 m, Ambient Temperature -60 to 30 °C and Ambient Relative Humidity 1 to 100 %, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the High-Altitude Suit Hypobaric Moisture Transport?
Have these to hand: Altitude, Ambient Temperature, Ambient Relative Humidity, Skin Temperature, Evaporative Resistance, Air-Layer Share of Resistance, Body Surface Area, Metabolic Heat Output and Heat Lost by Evaporation. With those entered, the tool returns Evaporative Capacity immediately.
What exactly is Evaporative Capacity?
Sweat the garment can move at these conditions. It is reported in g/h. It is derived from Altitude, Ambient Temperature, Ambient Relative Humidity, Skin Temperature, Evaporative Resistance, Air-Layer Share of Resistance, Body Surface Area, Metabolic Heat Output and Heat Lost by Evaporation, and is the figure the rest of the High-Performance Sports & Extreme Environments calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Altitude in m, Ambient Temperature in °C, Ambient Relative Humidity in %, Skin Temperature in °C, Evaporative Resistance in m²Pa/W, Air-Layer Share of Resistance in %, Body Surface Area in m², Metabolic Heat Output in W and Heat Lost by Evaporation in %. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Ambient Pressure, Vapour Pressure Difference, Pressure-Corrected Ret, Evaporative Flux, Required Sweat Rate and Capacity vs Requirement. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
A capacity ratio comfortably above one is not good news here — it means the climber is losing water at the full metabolic rate into air that will take all of it, and respiratory loss at altitude adds substantially more on top. The pressure correction applies only to the air-layer share of Ret; a membrane's own resistance is a material property and does not change with altitude, so that split has to be right or the answer is not. The model also assumes a fully wetted skin at steady state and ignores condensation and freezing within the insulation, which is the actual failure mode of multi-day cold-weather clothing. High-altitude physiology is medical territory and this is a clothing calculation, not physiological guidance. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.