Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
The mesh that stops whitefly is the mesh that turns your greenhouse into a sail. Those are the same property measured twice.
Total Drag Force
—kN
Wind load the screen transfers into the structure
Screen Properties
Porosity
—%
Equivalent Mesh Count
—per in
Screen Drag Coefficient
—×
Pressure Drop
—Pa
Smallest Opening Dimension
—mm
The drag relation is the classic screen result for flow forced through the mesh, and it is an upper bound: at high load a real screen deflects, spills flow around its edges and sheds part of what this predicts, while a taut screen on a rigid frame gets close to the full figure. Exclusion depends on the smallest opening dimension rather than the nominal mesh count, so a rectangular hole is only as insect-proof as its narrow side — the figure to compare against a thrips or whitefly thorax width. The load computed here is a wind action for a structural engineer to check the frame and anchors against, not a verdict on whether they are adequate.
Using this calculator
About the Insect Mesh Porosity vs Wind Load Drag Force
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
holeWidth
Hole Width
mm
holeHeight
Hole Height
mm
threadDiameter
Thread Diameter
mm
windSpeed
Design Wind Speed
m/s
airDensity
Air Density
kg/m³
screenArea
Exposed Screen Area
m²
dragForce
Total Drag Force
kN
porosity
Porosity
%
meshCount
Equivalent Mesh Count
per in
dragCoefficient
Screen Drag Coefficient
×
pressureDrop
Pressure Drop
Pa
maxOpening
Smallest Opening Dimension
mm
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Hole Width, Hole Height, Thread Diameter, Design Wind Speed, Air Density and Exposed Screen Area.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Total Drag Force together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Porosity, Equivalent Mesh Count, Screen Drag Coefficient, Pressure Drop and Smallest Opening Dimension — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Hole Width
mm
0.05 to 5 mm
0.27
Hole Height
mm
0.05 to 10 mm
0.77
Thread Diameter
mm
0.02 to 2 mm
0.24
Design Wind Speed
m/s
1 to 70 m/s
25
Air Density
kg/m³
0.8 to 1.4 kg/m³
1.225
Exposed Screen Area
m²
1 to 20000 m²
200
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Total Drag Force (headline result)
kN
Wind load the screen transfers into the structure
Porosity
%
Equivalent Mesh Count
per in
Screen Drag Coefficient
×
Pressure Drop
Pa
Smallest Opening Dimension
mm
Worked example
Given
Hole Width
0.27 mm
Hole Height
0.77 mm
Thread Diameter
0.24 mm
Design Wind Speed
25 m/s
Air Density
1.225 kg/m³
Exposed Screen Area
200 m²
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Total Drag Force shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Mesh Geometry and Wind & Structure. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Total Drag Force in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in kN.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Porosity, Equivalent Mesh Count, Screen Drag Coefficient, Pressure Drop and Smallest Opening Dimension) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Total Drag Force before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Agrotextiles & Environmental Shielding are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Total Drag Force is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Hole Width) shows how much of the gap in Total Drag Force each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Agrotextiles & Environmental Shielding practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
The drag relation is the classic screen result for flow forced through the mesh, and it is an upper bound: at high load a real screen deflects, spills flow around its edges and sheds part of what this predicts, while a taut screen on a rigid frame gets close to the full figure. Exclusion depends on the smallest opening dimension rather than the nominal mesh count, so a rectangular hole is only as insect-proof as its narrow side — the figure to compare against a thrips or whitefly thorax width. The load computed here is a wind action for a structural engineer to check the frame and anchors against, not a verdict on whether they are adequate.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Hole Width 0.05 to 5 mm, Hole Height 0.05 to 10 mm and Thread Diameter 0.02 to 2 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Insect Mesh Porosity vs Wind Load Drag Force?
Have these to hand: Hole Width, Hole Height, Thread Diameter, Design Wind Speed, Air Density and Exposed Screen Area. With those entered, the tool returns Total Drag Force immediately.
What exactly is Total Drag Force?
Wind load the screen transfers into the structure. It is reported in kN. It is derived from Hole Width, Hole Height, Thread Diameter, Design Wind Speed, Air Density and Exposed Screen Area, and is the figure the rest of the Agrotextiles & Environmental Shielding calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Hole Width in mm, Hole Height in mm, Thread Diameter in mm, Design Wind Speed in m/s, Air Density in kg/m³ and Exposed Screen Area in m². Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Porosity, Equivalent Mesh Count, Screen Drag Coefficient, Pressure Drop and Smallest Opening Dimension. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
The drag relation is the classic screen result for flow forced through the mesh, and it is an upper bound: at high load a real screen deflects, spills flow around its edges and sheds part of what this predicts, while a taut screen on a rigid frame gets close to the full figure. Exclusion depends on the smallest opening dimension rather than the nominal mesh count, so a rectangular hole is only as insect-proof as its narrow side — the figure to compare against a thrips or whitefly thorax width. The load computed here is a wind action for a structural engineer to check the frame and anchors against, not a verdict on whether they are adequate. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.