Home » Calculators » Spinning & Yarn » Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering » Air-Jet & Vortex Spinning Production, Air Demand & Energy per Kilogram
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Air-Jet Spinning

Air-Jet & Vortex Spinning Production, Air Demand & Energy per Kilogram

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Air-jet spinning has no mechanical speed limit. It has an air bill instead.

Production Delivery and positions
m/min
tex
%
Compressed Air What the nozzles consume and what it costs
Nm3/h
kWh/Nm3
/kWh
h/yr
mm
mm

Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram

— kWh/kg

The running cost that defines the process

Production, Air & Cost

Production per Position
— kg/h
Machine Production
— kg/h
Air per Kilogram of Yarn
— Nm3/kg
Total Air Demand
— Nm3/h
Compressor Power
— kW
Air Cost per Kilogram
— /kg
Annual Air Cost
—
Fibre Length to Nozzle Bore
— x

Specific air power is a system figure, not a compressor nameplate: it should include the dryer, the receiver losses and the distribution leakage, which together commonly add 20 to 30% to the compressor-only value. Leakage in particular is chronic in textile plants and can reach a third of total generation, so a measured plant figure will be worse than a catalogue one. Air per position is the manufacturer design value at the stated nozzle pressure and assumes correct nozzle condition; worn nozzles pass more air and spin worse. Production excludes piecing, doffing and lot changes beyond the efficiency term entered. The fibre-length to nozzle-bore ratio is reported as a configuration check rather than a performance prediction - the relationship between the two is empirical and machine-specific.

Using this calculator

About the Air-Jet & Vortex Spinning Production, Air Demand & Energy per Kilogram

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Delivery to kilograms
productionPerPosition = deliverySpeed x 60 x yarnTex / 1e6 x efficiency / 100

The same mass balance as any spinning position, but at four hundred metres a minute rather than twenty - roughly twenty times a ring spindle, which is the entire commercial argument for the process.

Air demand to electrical power
compressorPower = airPerPosition x positions x specificAirPower

Compressed air is normally costed at a specific power in kilowatt-hours per normal cubic metre, which bundles the compressor, the dryer and the distribution losses. Around 0.10 to 0.12 kWh/Nm3 is typical for a well-maintained system at 6 to 7 bar.

Normal cubic metres per kilogram of yarn
specificAirVolume = totalAir / totalProduction

This is the figure that transfers between machines and counts, and the one to compare against a supplier quotation. It rises steeply as the count gets finer, because air per position barely changes while output falls.

What air adds to every kilogram
energyPerKgYarn = compressorPower / totalProduction

Set this against the compacting figure on a ring frame, which is around 0.055 kWh/kg. Air-jet spinning is an order of magnitude above that on air alone - it is not an incidental utility, it is the dominant conversion cost.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
Nm3Normal cubic metre, gas volume at reference temperature and pressureNm3
MVSMurata Vortex Spinning, the common vortex implementation—
SAPSpecific air power, energy to produce a normal cubic metrekWh/Nm3

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 10 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Delivery Speed, Yarn Linear Density, Spinning Positions, Machine Efficiency, Air per Position, Compressor Specific Power, Energy Price, Operating Hours, Fibre Length and Nozzle Bore.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Production per Position, Machine Production, Air per Kilogram of Yarn, Total Air Demand, Compressor Power, Air Cost per Kilogram, Annual Air Cost and Fibre Length to Nozzle Bore — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Delivery Speedm/min100 to 600 m/min400
Yarn Linear Densitytex5 to 100 tex15
Spinning Positions—8 to 20096
Machine Efficiency%50 to 100 %92
Air per PositionNm3/h0.5 to 8 Nm3/h2.4
Compressor Specific PowerkWh/Nm30.05 to 0.25 kWh/Nm30.11
Energy Price/kWh0.01 to 1 /kWh0.11
Operating Hoursh/yr500 to 8760 h/yr8000
Fibre Lengthmm15 to 60 mm38
Nozzle Boremm0.5 to 3 mm1.2

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram (headline result)kWh/kgThe running cost that defines the process
Production per Positionkg/h
Machine Productionkg/h
Air per Kilogram of YarnNm3/kg
Total Air DemandNm3/h
Compressor PowerkW
Air Cost per Kilogram/kg
Annual Air Cost—
Fibre Length to Nozzle Borex

Worked example

Given

0
400 m/min of 15 tex yarn on 96 positions at 92% efficiency
1
2.4 Nm3/h of air per position
2
Compressor at 0.11 kWh/Nm3, energy at 0.11 per kWh
3
8,000 operating hours a year

Substituting

perPosition = 400 x 60 x 15 / 1e6 x 0.92 = 0.3312 kg/htotal = 0.3312 x 96 = 31.80 kg/hair = 2.4 x 96 = 230.4 Nm3/h, so 230.4 / 31.80 = 7.25 Nm3/kgcompressor = 230.4 x 0.11 = 25.34 kWenergyPerKg = 25.34 / 31.80 = 0.797 kWh/kg

Answer

0
0.797 kWh of air energy per kilogram of yarn
1
0.331 kg/h per position, 31.80 kg/h on the machine
2
7.25 Nm3 of air per kilogram of yarn
3
230.4 Nm3/h total, needing 25.34 kW of compressor
4
0.088 per kilogram, 22,303 a year

Nearly 0.8 kWh per kilogram on air alone, against roughly 0.055 for compacting a ring frame - fifteen times as much. Air-jet spinning trades capital and labour for energy, and a rise in the electricity tariff moves its economics far more than it moves ring spinning.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Production and Compressed Air. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in kWh/kg.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Production per Position, Machine Production, Air per Kilogram of Yarn, Total Air Demand, Compressor Power, Air Cost per Kilogram, Annual Air Cost and Fibre Length to Nozzle Bore) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Delivery Speed) shows how much of the gap in Compressed-Air Energy per Kilogram each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
5 - 9 Nm3/kgNormal specific air volume for medium counts.
0.6 - 1.0 kWh/kgTypical compressed-air energy intensity for air-jet spinning.
350 - 500 m/minWorking delivery range. Fibre control, not mechanics, sets the ceiling.
Fibre 30 - 40 mmAir-jet favours longer fibre than rotor; short fibre gives poor wrapper formation.

Assumptions and limits

  • Specific air power is a system figure, not a compressor nameplate: it should include the dryer, the receiver losses and the distribution leakage, which together commonly add 20 to 30% to the compressor-only value. Leakage in particular is chronic in textile plants and can reach a third of total generation, so a measured plant figure will be worse than a catalogue one. Air per position is the manufacturer design value at the stated nozzle pressure and assumes correct nozzle condition; worn nozzles pass more air and spin worse. Production excludes piecing, doffing and lot changes beyond the efficiency term entered. The fibre-length to nozzle-bore ratio is reported as a configuration check rather than a performance prediction - the relationship between the two is empirical and machine-specific.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Delivery Speed 100 to 600 m/min, Yarn Linear Density 5 to 100 tex and Spinning Positions 8 to 200, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ISO 1217 - Displacement compressors, acceptance tests, for the specific power figure.
  • ISO 8573-1 - Compressed air purity classes, which the nozzle air must meet.
  • ASTM D2256 - tensile properties, for comparing the yarn against ring and rotor.
  • ISO 50001 - energy management, for the intensity indicator this produces.

Questions people ask

Why is compressed air so expensive compared with other utilities?

Because compression is thermodynamically wasteful and most of the work becomes heat that is thrown away. Roughly 90% of the electrical energy into a compressor leaves as heat rather than as useful pneumatic work, so compressed air typically costs seven to ten times as much per unit of delivered energy as electricity does. On a process that uses air as its primary mechanism rather than as an auxiliary, that multiplier dominates the conversion cost.

Can nozzle pressure be reduced to save air?

Only within a narrow window. The nozzle air does the actual spinning - it creates the vortex that wraps the surface fibres round the core - so below a threshold the wrapper structure degrades and the yarn loses strength abruptly rather than gradually. There is usually a little headroom above the minimum for a given count and fibre, and finding it is worthwhile at 0.8 kWh/kg, but it is a quality-limited optimisation and not a free saving.

How does air-jet yarn compare with ring and rotor?

It is a third structure. Ring yarn has a continuous helix; rotor yarn is groove-built with wrapper fibres; air-jet yarn has a nearly parallel untwisted core bound by wrapper fibres at the surface. That gives low hairiness, good abrasion resistance and excellent pilling performance, at the cost of a harsher handle and lower strength than ring yarn of the same count. It suits longer, finer fibre and does not tolerate high short-fibre content, because short fibres do not form reliable wrappers.

Does the air demand change with yarn count?

The volume per position barely changes - the nozzle geometry and pressure are set by the fibre and the wrapper mechanism, not by the mass being spun. The air per kilogram changes a great deal, because a finer count produces less mass at the same delivery speed. Halving the tex nearly doubles the specific air volume and the energy per kilogram, which is why air-jet economics deteriorate on fine counts exactly where the yarn quality advantage is greatest.

Convert this result

Reference rate of 2026-10-05, published by the European Central Bank. Source

A reference rate is not a dealing rate. Banks and payment providers apply their own spread, so treat this as the mid-market figure a quotation is negotiated around rather than the money that will arrive.

Scroll to Top