Home » Calculators » Spinning & Yarn » Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering » Yarn Clearer Cut Rate, Splice Load & Clearing Efficiency
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Winding

Yarn Clearer Cut Rate, Splice Load & Clearing Efficiency

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Clearing costs 3.5% of the winder and 0.03% of the yarn. The cost is time, not material.

Cut Channels Cuts per 100 km on each channel
1/100 km
1/100 km
1/100 km
1/100 km
1/100 km

From Classimat or equivalent classification

Winding Conditions What each cut costs
m/min
m
s
tex
kg

Total Cut Rate

— 1/100 km

All four channels combined

Splices, Loss & Clearing Efficiency

Faults Removed
— %
Faults Passing Through
— 1/100 km
Splices per Package
—
Production Time Lost
— %
Cuts per Drum
— 1/h
Yarn Wasted
— %
Waste Rate
— kg/h
Splices per Kilometre
— 1/km

Cut rates are inputs from the clearer's own reporting, not predictions - no calculation derives them from thresholds, because that depends on the fault distribution of the specific yarn. Faults present should come from a Classimat or equivalent classification of the same yarn, and the two must be measured over comparable lengths for the clearing efficiency to mean anything; a clearing efficiency above 100% means the two figures came from different material or different fault definitions. Cut length varies with clearer type and with the fault length detected, so the waste figure is indicative. Production loss counts splice cycles only and excludes the ramp back to full winding speed after each restart, which adds a smaller further loss. Splices per package assume all cuts occur while that package is being built, which is true on average and not for any individual cone.

Using this calculator

About the Yarn Clearer Cut Rate, Splice Load & Clearing Efficiency

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Four channels, one stop rate
totalCuts = thinCuts + thickCuts + nepCuts + foreignCuts

The clearer watches independent fault classes and each has its own threshold, but the winder stops the same way for all of them. Totalling them is what converts a set of quality decisions into a single production consequence.

Cut rate scales with length wound
cutsPerHour = ( windingSpeed x 60 / 1000 ) / 100 x totalCuts

Faults are per unit length, so cuts per hour rise directly with winding speed. A clearer setting that is comfortable at 1,000 m/min is a different proposition at 1,800.

Material removed by clearing
wastePercent = cutsPerHour x cutLength / lengthPerHour x 100

Each cut removes a short length either side of the fault. At around a metre a cut this is a negligible mass - which is the point: clearing is not a yield problem, and arguing about it on material grounds misses where the cost is.

What share of the faults is actually caught
clearingEfficiency = totalCuts / faultsPresent x 100

Cuts made against faults present, both per 100 km. The remainder passes into the package and appears in the fabric. This is the quality half of the trade the production loss is buying.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
ClassimatThe standard classification of yarn faults by length and thickness—
channelOne fault class the clearer discriminates: thin, thick, nep, foreign—
cut lengthYarn removed either side of a detected faultm

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 10 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Thin Place Cuts, Thick Place Cuts, Nep Cuts, Foreign Fibre Cuts, Faults Present in the Yarn, Winding Speed, Yarn Removed per Cut, Splice Cycle Time, Yarn Linear Density and Package Weight.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Total Cut Rate together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Faults Removed, Faults Passing Through, Splices per Package, Production Time Lost, Cuts per Drum, Yarn Wasted, Waste Rate and Splices per Kilometre — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Thin Place Cuts1/100 km0 to 200 1/100 km4
Thick Place Cuts1/100 km0 to 200 1/100 km12
Nep Cuts1/100 km0 to 200 1/100 km7
Foreign Fibre Cuts1/100 km0 to 200 1/100 km2
Faults Present in the Yarn1/100 km1 to 500 1/100 km38From Classimat or equivalent classification
Winding Speedm/min400 to 2200 m/min1400
Yarn Removed per Cutm0.2 to 10 m1.2
Splice Cycle Times2 to 30 s6
Yarn Linear Densitytex4 to 200 tex20
Package Weightkg0.3 to 5 kg1.9

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Total Cut Rate (headline result)1/100 kmAll four channels combined
Faults Removed%
Faults Passing Through1/100 km
Splices per Package—
Production Time Lost%
Cuts per Drum1/h
Yarn Wasted%
Waste Ratekg/h
Splices per Kilometre1/km

Worked example

Given

0
4 thin, 12 thick, 7 nep and 2 foreign cuts per 100 km
1
38 faults per 100 km present in the yarn
2
1,400 m/min, 1.2 m removed per cut, 6 s splice cycle
3
20 tex yarn in 1.9 kg packages

Substituting

totalCuts = 4 + 12 + 7 + 2 = 25 per 100 kmlengthPerHour = 1400 x 60 / 1000 = 84 km/h; cutsPerHour = 0.84 x 25 = 21stopped = 21 x 6 = 126 s in 3,600, which is 3.50%waste = 21 x 0.0012 km = 0.0252 km/h out of 84 = 0.03%clearingEfficiency = 25 / 38 = 65.79%

Answer

0
25 cuts per 100 km in total
1
65.79% of faults removed; 13 per 100 km pass through
2
23.75 splices per package, 0.25 per kilometre
3
3.50% of production time lost, 21 cuts per drum-hour
4
Only 0.03% of yarn wasted - 0.0005 kg/h

The two loss figures are three orders of magnitude apart: 3.50% of the winding department against 0.03% of the yarn. Any discussion of clearer settings framed around waste is looking at the wrong number - the cost of clearing is machine time and splice count, and both are bought back only in fabric quality.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Cut Channels and Winding Conditions. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Total Cut Rate in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in 1/100 km.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Faults Removed, Faults Passing Through, Splices per Package, Production Time Lost, Cuts per Drum, Yarn Wasted, Waste Rate and Splices per Kilometre) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Total Cut Rate before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Total Cut Rate is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Thin Place Cuts) shows how much of the gap in Total Cut Rate each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Spinning, Winding & Yarn Package Engineering practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
15 - 40 cuts/100 kmNormal total cut rate on sound yarn.
60 - 80% clearing efficiencyTypical. Chasing 100% multiplies cuts for diminishing fabric benefit.
Under 30 splices per packageAcceptable splice load for most end uses.
Production loss above 8%The clearer is set for a yarn quality the mill is not producing.

Assumptions and limits

  • Cut rates are inputs from the clearer's own reporting, not predictions - no calculation derives them from thresholds, because that depends on the fault distribution of the specific yarn. Faults present should come from a Classimat or equivalent classification of the same yarn, and the two must be measured over comparable lengths for the clearing efficiency to mean anything; a clearing efficiency above 100% means the two figures came from different material or different fault definitions. Cut length varies with clearer type and with the fault length detected, so the waste figure is indicative. Production loss counts splice cycles only and excludes the ramp back to full winding speed after each restart, which adds a smaller further loss. Splices per package assume all cuts occur while that package is being built, which is true on average and not for any individual cone.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Thin Place Cuts 0 to 200 1/100 km, Thick Place Cuts 0 to 200 1/100 km and Nep Cuts 0 to 200 1/100 km, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • USTER Classimat fault classification, the length-and-thickness grid the channels are set on.
  • ASTM D1425 / ISO 16549 - unevenness testing by capacitance, from which the thresholds derive.
  • ISO 2062 - single-end breaking force, for splice strength retention.

Questions people ask

Why not set the clearer to remove every fault?

Because each removal creates a splice, and a splice is itself a fault - thicker than the yarn, 10 to 20% weaker, and visible in a plain fabric. Chasing the last 30% of faults typically doubles or triples the cut rate, so the package gains fifty splices to lose a dozen faults. Past a point the yarn is measurably worse, and the winding department is running at a production loss to make it so.

Which channel should be tightened first?

Whichever is causing the fabric complaint, which is rarely the one cutting most. Thick places and neps show in plain woven and in fine knits; thin places matter for strength and for warp breaks; foreign fibre matters enormously in a pale shade and hardly at all in a dark one. The channel rates here are the cost side - deciding which to spend on requires the fabric fault data, not the winding data.

Does clearing improve the yarn or just remove faults?

It removes faults and adds splices, and the net is a judgement rather than an improvement. The mean and CV of the yarn are essentially untouched - clearing acts on rare events, not on the bulk distribution. What it changes is the extreme tail, which is what appears in fabric. A clearer cannot make a bad yarn good; it can stop the worst 20 metres of a bad yarn reaching the loom, at the price of a splice in that spot.

Why is the waste figure so small?

Because a cut removes about a metre of yarn and the drum winds 84 kilometres an hour. Twenty-one cuts remove twenty-five metres from eighty-four thousand - three hundredths of a per cent, half a gram an hour. The material cost of clearing is genuinely negligible, and the reason the figure is reported here is to settle the argument: the case for or against a clearer setting has to be made on machine time and on fabric quality, never on yarn wasted.

Scroll to Top