Home » Calculators » Fibre & Raw Material » Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion » Filament Denier, Spinneret Hole Throughput & Spin Draw Ratio
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Melt Spinning

Filament Denier, Spinneret Hole Throughput & Spin Draw Ratio

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Denier is fixed by mass balance before the quench cabinet is reached.

Mass Balance What sets the denier, and nothing else does
kg/h
m/min
Capillary & Polymer What sets the shear rate and the attenuation
mm
g/cm3

PET melt about 1.20, PP melt about 0.75

g/cm3

Denier per Filament

— den

From throughput, hole count and take-up speed alone

Filament, Die & Attenuation

Dtex per Filament
— dtex
Total Yarn Denier
— den
Solid Filament Diameter
— um
Die Exit Velocity
— m/min
Spin Draw Ratio
— x
Capillary Wall Shear Rate
— 1/s
Throughput per Hole
— g/min
Hole to Filament Diameter Ratio
— x

Denier here is the nominal spun value from mass balance; the wound package will read slightly lower after any relaxation and slightly different again after drawing or texturing, so a measured skein count will not match this exactly. The filament diameter assumes a solid circular section - it is wrong for hollow, trilobal or other profiled spinnerets, where the same linear density corresponds to a larger circumscribed dimension. Die swell is not modelled: the extrudate expands on leaving the capillary before it attenuates, so the true maximum diameter exceeds the hole and the effective draw is greater than the ratio shown. The shear rate is the apparent Newtonian wall value and takes no account of entrance pressure losses, which for a short capillary can exceed the capillary loss itself.

Using this calculator

About the Filament Denier, Spinneret Hole Throughput & Spin Draw Ratio

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Mass balance to denier
throughputPerHole = polymerThroughput x 1000 / ( holeCount x 60 ) denier = throughputPerHole x 9000 / takeUpSpeed

Denier is the mass in grams of 9000 m of filament. In one minute a hole delivers its share of the throughput and the winder takes up the take-up speed in metres, so the mass per 9000 m follows from the ratio directly. No property of the polymer enters.

What the spinline is actually asked to do
dieExitVelocity = ( throughputPerHole / meltDensity ) / capillaryArea spinDrawRatio = takeUpSpeed / dieExitVelocity

Volumetric rate divided by capillary area gives the speed the melt leaves the die at. The winder is running a hundred times faster, and the spin draw ratio is that gap. It is not dialled in - it is the consequence of the three mass-balance inputs and the hole size.

Apparent wall shear rate in the capillary
capillaryShearRate = 32 x volumetricRate / ( pi x holeDiameter^3 )

The Rabinowitsch-uncorrected Newtonian wall shear rate for flow in a round tube. Polymer melts are shear-thinning so the true wall value is higher, but the apparent figure is the one rheology data is reported against and the one to compare between dies.

Linear density to a real diameter
filamentDiameter = sqrt( 4 x dtex x 1e-7 / ( fibreDensity x 1000 x pi ) )

Dtex is mass per 10,000 m; dividing by the solid density gives cross-sectional area, and a round section gives the diameter. It uses the solid density rather than the melt density because the filament has cooled and crystallised by the time it is measured.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
QPolymer mass throughput to the packkg/h
NNumber of capillaries in the spinneret—
VTake-up or godet speedm/min
SDRSpin draw ratio, take-up speed over die exit velocityx
gamma-dotApparent wall shear rate in the capillary1/s

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Polymer Throughput, Spinneret Holes, Take-Up Speed, Capillary Diameter, Melt Density at the Die and Solid Fibre Density.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Denier per Filament together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Dtex per Filament, Total Yarn Denier, Solid Filament Diameter, Die Exit Velocity, Spin Draw Ratio, Capillary Wall Shear Rate, Throughput per Hole and Hole to Filament Diameter Ratio — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Polymer Throughputkg/h0.5 to 3000 kg/h100
Spinneret Holes—1 to 2000001000
Take-Up Speedm/min50 to 8000 m/min3000
Capillary Diametermm0.05 to 2 mm0.25
Melt Density at the Dieg/cm30.6 to 2 g/cm31.2PET melt about 1.20, PP melt about 0.75
Solid Fibre Densityg/cm30.7 to 3 g/cm31.38

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Denier per Filament (headline result)denFrom throughput, hole count and take-up speed alone
Dtex per Filamentdtex
Total Yarn Denierden
Solid Filament Diameterum
Die Exit Velocitym/min
Spin Draw Ratiox
Capillary Wall Shear Rate1/s
Throughput per Holeg/min
Hole to Filament Diameter Ratiox

Worked example

Given

0
100 kg/h of PET through a 1,000-hole spinneret
1
Take-up at 3,000 m/min - POY conditions
2
0.25 mm capillaries, melt density 1.20 g/cm3, solid density 1.38 g/cm3

Substituting

Per hole: 100 x 1000 / (1000 x 60) = 1.6667 g/mindenier = 1.6667 x 9000 / 3000 = 5.00 exactlyCapillary area = pi x (0.0125 cm)^2 = 4.909e-4 cm2; 1.6667 / 1.20 = 1.389 cm3/minDie exit = 1.389 / 4.909e-4 = 2,829 cm/min = 28.29 m/min, so SDR = 3000 / 28.29 = 106.0

Answer

0
5.00 denier per filament, 5.556 dtex, 5,000 den total
1
Filament diameter 22.64 um
2
Die exit velocity 28.29 m/min, spin draw ratio 106.0
3
Capillary wall shear rate 15,090 1/s
4
Hole is 11.04 times the diameter of the filament it produces

The attenuation ratio of 11 against a spin draw ratio of 106 is the check that the two are consistent: area scales as diameter squared, and 11.04 squared is 122, against 106 once the density change from melt to solid is taken out. The spinline stretches the filament by two orders of magnitude in a metre of free air.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Mass Balance and Capillary & Polymer. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Denier per Filament in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in den.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Dtex per Filament, Total Yarn Denier, Solid Filament Diameter, Die Exit Velocity, Spin Draw Ratio, Capillary Wall Shear Rate, Throughput per Hole and Hole to Filament Diameter Ratio) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Denier per Filament before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Denier per Filament is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Polymer Throughput) shows how much of the gap in Denier per Filament each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Polymer Rheology & Synthetic Extrusion practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
1 - 3 dpfMicrofibre and fine apparel filament. Quench uniformity dominates.
3 - 6 dpfStandard apparel POY and staple.
Shear rate 5,000 - 30,000 1/sNormal capillary window for PET. Above it, melt fracture and die swell instability appear.
SDR 50 - 150Typical POY. Very high ratios raise spinline stress and the risk of filament breaks.

Assumptions and limits

  • Denier here is the nominal spun value from mass balance; the wound package will read slightly lower after any relaxation and slightly different again after drawing or texturing, so a measured skein count will not match this exactly. The filament diameter assumes a solid circular section - it is wrong for hollow, trilobal or other profiled spinnerets, where the same linear density corresponds to a larger circumscribed dimension. Die swell is not modelled: the extrudate expands on leaving the capillary before it attenuates, so the true maximum diameter exceeds the hole and the effective draw is greater than the ratio shown. The shear rate is the apparent Newtonian wall value and takes no account of entrance pressure losses, which for a short capillary can exceed the capillary loss itself.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Polymer Throughput 0.5 to 3000 kg/h, Spinneret Holes 1 to 200000 and Take-Up Speed 50 to 8000 m/min, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ISO 1144 and ISO 2060 - linear density designation and determination, which define denier and dtex.
  • ASTM D1907 - Linear Density of Yarn by the Skein Method, for verifying the computed denier on the wound product.
  • ISO 11443 - Determination of the fluidity of plastics using capillary rheometers, the reference for the apparent shear rate used here.

Questions people ask

If I want finer filament, do I slow the throughput or speed the winder?

Either changes the denier, and they are not equivalent. Raising take-up speed at constant throughput raises the spinline stress, which raises orientation and crystallinity - the yarn is finer and also structurally different, which is exactly how POY and FOY are distinguished. Cutting throughput at constant speed leaves the spinline stress roughly alone and lowers the shear rate in the capillary. The denier arithmetic cannot tell them apart; the yarn can.

Why does the spin draw ratio come out near 100 when the draw frame ratio is 4?

They are different operations on different material. Spin draw ratio is attenuation of a molten thread line in free air, where the polymer is liquid and offers almost no resistance - a hundredfold is routine and produces little orientation on its own. Draw ratio at the draw frame is deformation of a solid, oriented filament below its melting point, where four times is already near the limit and is what creates the tenacity. Confusing the two makes a POY line look impossibly aggressive.

Is the shear rate here the true wall shear rate?

No - it is the apparent Newtonian value, without the Rabinowitsch correction. Polymer melts shear-thin, so the true wall shear rate is higher, typically by 20 to 30% at a power-law index around 0.6. The apparent value is still the right one to quote, because capillary rheometry data is published against it and because comparisons between dies and throughputs stay valid. Apply the correction only when feeding an absolute viscosity model.

Why use melt density for the die and solid density for the filament?

Because the polymer is in different states at the two points. At the capillary it is a melt at 285 C and about 1.20 g/cm3; on the winder it is a cooled, partly crystalline solid at about 1.38. Using one density for both is a common slip and it puts about a 15% error into either the die exit velocity or the filament diameter, depending which way it is made.

Scroll to Top