Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.
Anchorage is bought with depth, not just length. A grid a metre down does a third of the work of the same grid three metres down.
Pullout Resistance
—kN/m
Anchorage the embedded length develops per metre of wall
Anchorage Check
Effective Overburden
—kPa
Interface Friction Coefficient
—×
Factor of Safety
—×
Embedment for Target FoS
—m
Resistance per Metre Embedded
—kN/m per m
Overburden is taken as dry soil weight times depth, so it ignores surcharge, sloping backfill and any water table — all three change the answer materially and belong in a full stability analysis. The interaction coefficient is not a soil property; it is a fitted result for one grid geometry in one backfill, and borrowing it from a datasheet for a different aperture or a different gradation is the usual source of an unsafe answer. Reinforced soil structures are governed by design codes and must be signed off by a qualified geotechnical engineer.
Using this calculator
About the Geogrid Pullout Resistance & Soil Friction Coefficient
The formula
This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.
Each input feeds the expression evaluated in the browser; the symbol table below names every term and its unit.
Symbols used above
Symbol
Stands for
Unit
unitWeight
Soil Unit Weight
kN/m³
frictionAngle
Soil Friction Angle
°
depth
Depth Below Wall Crest
m
embedmentLength
Length Beyond Failure Plane
m
interactionCoeff
Interaction Coefficient
×
designTension
Design Tension in Layer
kN/m
targetFoS
Target Factor of Safety
×
pulloutResistance
Pullout Resistance
kN/m
overburdenStress
Effective Overburden
kPa
frictionCoefficient
Interface Friction Coefficient
×
factorOfSafety
Factor of Safety
×
requiredEmbedment
Embedment for Target FoS
m
resistancePerMetre
Resistance per Metre Embedded
kN/m per m
How the result is derived
Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.
The 7 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Soil Unit Weight, Soil Friction Angle, Depth Below Wall Crest, Length Beyond Failure Plane, Interaction Coefficient, Design Tension in Layer and Target Factor of Safety.
Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Pullout Resistance together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
The supporting outputs — Effective Overburden, Interface Friction Coefficient, Factor of Safety, Embedment for Target FoS and Resistance per Metre Embedded — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.
What each input means
Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.
Input
Unit
Accepted range
Default
What it means
Soil Unit Weight
kN/m³
12 to 24 kN/m³
18
Soil Friction Angle
°
15 to 50 °
32
Depth Below Wall Crest
m
0.3 to 30 m
3
Length Beyond Failure Plane
m
0.1 to 20 m
1.5
Interaction Coefficient
×
0.1 to 1.5 ×
0.8
From pullout tests on the actual grid and backfill.
Design Tension in Layer
kN/m
0.5 to 300 kN/m
20
Target Factor of Safety
×
1 to 5 ×
1.5
What the tool returns
The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.
Output
Unit
What it tells you
Pullout Resistance (headline result)
kN/m
Anchorage the embedded length develops per metre of wall
Effective Overburden
kPa
Interface Friction Coefficient
×
Factor of Safety
×
Embedment for Target FoS
m
Resistance per Metre Embedded
kN/m per m
Worked example
Given
Soil Unit Weight
18 kN/m³
Soil Friction Angle
32 °
Depth Below Wall Crest
3 m
Length Beyond Failure Plane
1.5 m
Interaction Coefficient
0.8 ×
Design Tension in Layer
20 kN/m
Target Factor of Safety
1.5 ×
The tool loads with this case already solved — the Pullout Resistance shown above is its answer. Change one value and the difference from this baseline is the sensitivity of the result to that variable.
How to use it
Work through the input groups in order — Soil & Depth and Geogrid & Design. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
Read Pullout Resistance in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in kN/m.
Check the supporting rows underneath (Effective Overburden, Interface Friction Coefficient, Factor of Safety, Embedment for Target FoS and Resistance per Metre Embedded) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.
Where this is used
Process planning — establishing Pullout Resistance before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Geosynthetics & Civil Engineering are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
Costing and quotation — Pullout Resistance is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Soil Unit Weight) shows how much of the gap in Pullout Resistance each variable explains.
Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Geosynthetics & Civil Engineering practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.
Assumptions and limits
Overburden is taken as dry soil weight times depth, so it ignores surcharge, sloping backfill and any water table — all three change the answer materially and belong in a full stability analysis. The interaction coefficient is not a soil property; it is a fitted result for one grid geometry in one backfill, and borrowing it from a datasheet for a different aperture or a different gradation is the usual source of an unsafe answer. Reinforced soil structures are governed by design codes and must be signed off by a qualified geotechnical engineer.
Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Soil Unit Weight 12 to 24 kN/m³, Soil Friction Angle 15 to 50 ° and Depth Below Wall Crest 0.3 to 30 m, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.
Questions people ask
What do I need to know before using the Geogrid Pullout Resistance & Soil Friction Coefficient?
Have these to hand: Soil Unit Weight, Soil Friction Angle, Depth Below Wall Crest, Length Beyond Failure Plane, Interaction Coefficient, Design Tension in Layer and Target Factor of Safety. With those entered, the tool returns Pullout Resistance immediately.
What exactly is Pullout Resistance?
Anchorage the embedded length develops per metre of wall. It is reported in kN/m. It is derived from Soil Unit Weight, Soil Friction Angle, Depth Below Wall Crest, Length Beyond Failure Plane, Interaction Coefficient, Design Tension in Layer and Target Factor of Safety, and is the figure the rest of the Geosynthetics & Civil Engineering calculation is built around.
Which units does this calculator expect?
Enter Soil Unit Weight in kN/m³, Soil Friction Angle in °, Depth Below Wall Crest in m, Length Beyond Failure Plane in m, Interaction Coefficient in ×, Design Tension in Layer in kN/m and Target Factor of Safety in ×. Mixing unit systems is the most common cause of a result that looks an order of magnitude wrong — convert before typing, not after reading.
What are the other figures under the main result?
They are the intermediate quantities the calculation passes through: Effective Overburden, Interface Friction Coefficient, Factor of Safety, Embedment for Target FoS and Resistance per Metre Embedded. They are shown because a headline number nobody can trace is a number nobody trusts — checking them against your own expectation is the fastest way to confirm the inputs were read as you intended.
Can I rely on this for a production decision?
Overburden is taken as dry soil weight times depth, so it ignores surcharge, sloping backfill and any water table — all three change the answer materially and belong in a full stability analysis. The interaction coefficient is not a soil property; it is a fitted result for one grid geometry in one backfill, and borrowing it from a datasheet for a different aperture or a different gradation is the usual source of an unsafe answer. Reinforced soil structures are governed by design codes and must be signed off by a qualified geotechnical engineer. Treat the output as an engineering estimate that narrows the trial window, not as a substitute for the trial.