Home » Calculators » Weaving & Fabric Formation » Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control » Let-Off Torque, Warp Tension Swing & Take-Up Load
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Loom Setting

Let-Off Torque, Warp Tension Swing & Take-Up Load

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Constant torque is not constant tension. The beam empties, and the warp finds out.

Warp Sheet Ends, count and the tension each one carries
cN
tex
cN/tex

Sized yarn, single-end test

Beam & Cloth Radii the torque acts on
m
m
cm

Total Warp Sheet Tension

— N

What the let-off has to hold back

Torque, Swing & Loading

Tension Swing, Full to Empty
— %
Beam Torque at Full Diameter
— Nm
Beam Torque at Empty Barrel
— Nm
Torque Ratio
— x
Tension per End at Empty Beam
— cN
Specific Tension
— cN/tex
Fraction of Breaking Load Used
— %
Torque Change per cm of Diameter
— Nm/cm
Take-Up Load Across the Cloth
— N/cm

The tension swing assumes an uncompensated constant-torque let-off with the brake set at the mean radius, which is the worst case; compensated weight-lever mechanisms reduce it and electronic let-off with back-rest feedback removes it, so treat this figure as an upper bound unless the compensation is known to be correctly set. Tension per end is taken as uniform across the sheet, which it never is: ends at the selvedge and ends crossing a badly wound beam patch can carry substantially more, and the peak end tension rather than the mean is what breaks. Dynamic tension during beat-up peaks well above the static value calculated here - typically 20 to 40% higher at the moment of beat-up - so the fraction of breaking load quoted is a static figure and the instantaneous loading is worse. Yarn tenacity should be the sized single-end value at the actual test conditions, not the unsized figure from the spinning report.

Using this calculator

About the Let-Off Torque, Warp Tension Swing & Take-Up Load

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Sheet tension in newtons
totalTension = warpEnds x tensionPerEnd / 100

Warp tension is set and measured per end in centinewtons because that is what a tension meter reads on a single end, but the let-off has to react the sum. A hundred centinewtons make a newton, so 5,200 ends at 42 cN is 2,184 N - about the weight of two people hanging on the beam.

Torque is tension times radius
torque = totalTension x diameter / 2

The beam is a lever whose arm shrinks as it unwinds. Everything difficult about let-off follows from this one line: the machine wants constant tension and the geometry keeps changing the relationship between tension and the torque that produces it.

What a constant-torque brake actually delivers
tension( r ) = tensionSet x rMean / r swing = ( tensionAtEmpty - tensionAtFull ) / tensionSet

Set a friction brake at the mean radius and tension runs low on a full beam and high on an empty one, inversely with radius. The swing is set by the ratio of the extreme radii, not by the tension level - it is a geometric fact and no amount of careful brake setting removes it.

Tension against what the yarn can take
specificTension = tensionPerEnd / tex loading = tensionPerEnd / ( tenacity x tex ) x 100

Absolute tension means nothing without the count. Specific tension in cN/tex is comparable across counts, and the percentage of breaking load is the number that says whether the warp is being asked to weave or to fail.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
cNCentinewton - the unit warp tension meters readcN
texYarn linear density, grams per 1,000 metrestex
specific tensionTension per unit linear density, comparable across countscN/tex
let-offThe mechanism releasing warp from the beam under control—

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 7 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Ends in the Warp, Tension per End, Warp Yarn Count, Yarn Tenacity, Full Beam Diameter, Empty Beam Barrel Diameter and Fabric Width in Reed.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Total Warp Sheet Tension together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Tension Swing, Full to Empty, Beam Torque at Full Diameter, Beam Torque at Empty Barrel, Torque Ratio, Tension per End at Empty Beam, Specific Tension, Fraction of Breaking Load Used, Torque Change per cm of Diameter and Take-Up Load Across the Cloth — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Ends in the Warp—100 to 300005200
Tension per EndcN1 to 500 cN42
Warp Yarn Counttex2 to 400 tex30
Yarn TenacitycN/tex3 to 60 cN/tex14Sized yarn, single-end test
Full Beam Diameterm0.2 to 1.6 m0.8
Empty Beam Barrel Diameterm0.05 to 0.8 m0.22
Fabric Width in Reedcm20 to 540 cm180

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Total Warp Sheet Tension (headline result)NWhat the let-off has to hold back
Tension Swing, Full to Empty%
Beam Torque at Full DiameterNm
Beam Torque at Empty BarrelNm
Torque Ratiox
Tension per End at Empty BeamcN
Specific TensioncN/tex
Fraction of Breaking Load Used%
Torque Change per cm of DiameterNm/cm
Take-Up Load Across the ClothN/cm

Worked example

Given

0
5,200 ends of 30 tex at 42 cN each
1
Sized yarn tenacity 14 cN/tex
2
Beam 800 mm full, 220 mm barrel
3
180 cm fabric width in the reed

Substituting

total = 5,200 x 42 / 100 = 2,184 NtorqueFull = 2,184 x 0.4 = 873.6 NmtorqueEmpty = 2,184 x 0.11 = 240.24 NmrMean = 0.255 m, so tension at barrel = 42 x 0.255 / 0.11 = 97.3636 cNloading = 42 / ( 14 x 30 ) x 100 = 10%

Answer

0
2,184 N of total warp sheet tension
1
873.6 Nm at full beam falling to 240.24 Nm at the barrel, a ratio of 3.6364
2
A constant-torque brake swings tension 168.0682%, reaching 97.3636 cN per end
3
Specific tension 1.4 cN/tex, using 10% of breaking load
4
10.92 Nm per cm of diameter, 12.1333 N/cm across the cloth

The 10% of breaking load is the check that matters: it sits in the accepted 8 to 15% band, so the setting is sound at the mean radius. But 97.36 cN at the empty beam is 23% of breaking load, and that is why warp breaks cluster in the last few metres of a beam on machines with mechanical let-off. The defect is real, it has a shape, and it is entirely predicted by the radius ratio.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Warp Sheet and Beam & Cloth. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Total Warp Sheet Tension in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in N.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Tension Swing, Full to Empty, Beam Torque at Full Diameter, Beam Torque at Empty Barrel, Torque Ratio, Tension per End at Empty Beam, Specific Tension, Fraction of Breaking Load Used, Torque Change per cm of Diameter and Take-Up Load Across the Cloth) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Total Warp Sheet Tension before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Total Warp Sheet Tension is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Ends in the Warp) shows how much of the gap in Total Warp Sheet Tension each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
8 - 15% of breaking loadThe accepted warp tension band for staple yarn weaving.
0.8 - 2.0 cN/texTypical specific warp tension across cotton and blended counts.
Torque ratio 3 - 4xNormal for a full beam of 800 mm on a 200 - 250 mm barrel.
Swing above 100%Mechanical let-off will not hold this beam. Electronic control or mid-beam re-setting is required.

Assumptions and limits

  • The tension swing assumes an uncompensated constant-torque let-off with the brake set at the mean radius, which is the worst case; compensated weight-lever mechanisms reduce it and electronic let-off with back-rest feedback removes it, so treat this figure as an upper bound unless the compensation is known to be correctly set. Tension per end is taken as uniform across the sheet, which it never is: ends at the selvedge and ends crossing a badly wound beam patch can carry substantially more, and the peak end tension rather than the mean is what breaks. Dynamic tension during beat-up peaks well above the static value calculated here - typically 20 to 40% higher at the moment of beat-up - so the fraction of breaking load quoted is a static figure and the instantaneous loading is worse. Yarn tenacity should be the sized single-end value at the actual test conditions, not the unsized figure from the spinning report.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Ends in the Warp 100 to 30000, Tension per End 1 to 500 cN and Warp Yarn Count 2 to 400 tex, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ISO 2062 - determination of single-end breaking force and elongation of yarns.
  • ASTM D2256 - tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method.
  • ISO 1144 - textiles, universal system for designating linear density, the tex system.
  • ISO 3572 - textiles, weaving, definitions of general terms and basic weave structures.

Questions people ask

Why do warp breaks increase toward the end of a beam?

Because the tension rises and nobody changed a setting. On a mechanically braked let-off, the braking torque is roughly fixed while the radius it acts on shrinks by a factor of three or four, so warp tension climbs steadily through the beam and is highest exactly when the yarn has already been through the most abrasion. In the worked example it reaches 23% of breaking load at the barrel against 10% at the mean, and that is enough to move a marginal warp from acceptable to unweavable. The diagnostic signature is unmistakable once you look for it: a stop-rate chart that rises through the beam and resets when a new one is gaited.

How does electronic let-off solve this?

By closing the loop on tension rather than on torque. A load cell in the back-rest measures the sheet tension directly, and the let-off motor is driven to whatever torque holds that measured value, continuously recalculating as the radius falls. The beam diameter no longer appears in the control problem at all - it becomes a disturbance the loop rejects, along with beam eccentricity, temperature-driven changes in yarn modulus and the tension pulse from each beat-up. That is why the same warp can weave at a lower mean tension on an electronic machine: the setting no longer has to be high enough at full beam to still be adequate at the barrel, nor low enough at the barrel to be tolerable at full beam.

Is the constant-torque model fair to a real mechanical let-off?

It is the worst case, and deliberately so. A real weight-lever let-off has some compensation built in - the classic designs move the weight or change the leverage as the beam empties, and a well-maintained one might hold the swing to half of the geometric figure. But that compensation is a linkage that has to be set correctly, and it is the first thing to be left in the wrong hole after a beam change. The uncompensated figure is what the mill will actually experience on the machine that nobody adjusted, which makes it the right number to plan against. Where the compensation is known to work, treat the reported swing as an upper bound and measure the real tension at both ends of a beam to calibrate.

What tension should the take-up be set to relative to the warp?

Take-up tension is not an independent setting in the way warp tension is - it is largely determined by the fabric being formed and the cloth roll geometry, and its job is to hold the cloth fell in a fixed position rather than to stretch the fabric. The figure reported here, load per centimetre of cloth width, is useful mainly as a comparison across widths and constructions and as an input to cloth roll and temple loading. Setting it too high pulls the fell forward and opens the weave near the selvedge; too low and the fell drifts back and beat-up becomes irregular, showing as a fabric set mark. The practical control is fell position, and this number is the force behind it.

Scroll to Top