Home » Calculators » Weaving & Fabric Formation » Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control » Shed Geometry, Warp Strain & Abrasion Exposure
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Loom Setting

Shed Geometry, Warp Strain & Abrasion Exposure

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

A third of one per cent of strain, applied 2,200 times a metre. That is what sizing is for.

Shed Geometry Deflection at the healds and the distances either side
mm
mm
mm
mm
Yarn & Construction What the strain is being applied to, and how often
%
/cm
rpm
/cm
/cm

Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed

— %

Extra path length over the straight warp line

Strain Split, Loading & Exposure

Top Minus Bottom Strain
— %
Top Shed Line Strain
— %
Bottom Shed Line Strain
— %
Strain as Share of Breaking Extension
— %
Abrasion Exposure Index
— %-cycles/m
Shed Cycles per Metre of Cloth
— /m
Shed Cycles per Hour
— /h
Top Shed Angle at the Heald
— deg
Total Heald Traverse
— mm
Ends per Dent
—

This is the static geometric strain at full shed and it understates the true loading in two ways. The shed opens and closes once per pick, so the strain is dynamic and the yarn sees a strain rate rather than a held extension; at 550 rpm the full cycle occupies about 0.1 s. And beat-up superimposes a further tension peak, typically 20 to 40% above the static value, at the moment the reed drives the pick home. The calculation treats one heald frame with one pair of distances; on a loom with graduated shed the frames differ and each should be computed separately. Back rest height and its vertical offset from the warp line change the top-bottom split substantially and are not modelled here - only the deflections at the heald are taken as given. The abrasion index is a relative ranking quantity for comparing constructions on one machine, not an absolute break rate.

Using this calculator

About the Shed Geometry, Warp Strain & Abrasion Exposure

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Two right triangles either side of the heald
strain = ( sqrt( front^2 + h^2 ) + sqrt( back^2 + h^2 ) - ( front + back ) ) / ( front + back ) x 100

The warp is straight at closed shed and becomes two hypotenuses at open shed. That is the entire mechanism, and it explains why the strain is so sensitive to the front distance: the shorter leg dominates because the same deflection is a steeper angle there.

Why sheds are set unequal
asymmetry = topStrain - bottomStrain

A geometrically symmetric shed strains the top and bottom lines equally, but the bottom line is helped by the warp's own weight and the back rest position. Setting the bottom shorter equalises the real loading, which is why an asymmetric shed is standard rather than a compromise.

Strain times cycles per metre
abrasionIndex = meanStrain x picksPerCm x 100

Neither number alone predicts warp breaks. A dense construction at low strain and an open one at high strain can impose the same total exposure, and this product is what makes them comparable.

Fraction of the yarn's extension used up
strainUtilisation = meanStrain / breakingExtension x 100

The shed uses a few per cent of the yarn's available extension per cycle. That sounds negligible and is not, because it is a fatigue loading: the same small strain repeated tens of thousands of times over the beam.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
shedThe opening formed between the two warp sheets for the weft to pass—
fellThe line where newly beaten-up weft joins the cloth—
back restThe roller the warp passes over between beam and healds—
hDeflection of the warp line at the heald eyemm

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 9 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Top Shed Line Deflection, Bottom Shed Line Deflection, Cloth Fell to Heald, Heald to Back Rest, Yarn Breaking Extension, Pick Density, Loom Speed, Warp Density and Reed Dents.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Top Minus Bottom Strain, Top Shed Line Strain, Bottom Shed Line Strain, Strain as Share of Breaking Extension, Abrasion Exposure Index, Shed Cycles per Metre of Cloth, Shed Cycles per Hour, Top Shed Angle at the Heald, Total Heald Traverse and Ends per Dent — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Top Shed Line Deflectionmm1 to 120 mm32
Bottom Shed Line Deflectionmm1 to 120 mm28
Cloth Fell to Healdmm50 to 900 mm300
Heald to Back Restmm100 to 2000 mm550
Yarn Breaking Extension%1 to 60 %6
Pick Density/cm2 to 120 /cm22
Loom Speedrpm50 to 1500 rpm550
Warp Density/cm2 to 200 /cm28
Reed Dents/cm1 to 60 /cm7

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed (headline result)%Extra path length over the straight warp line
Top Minus Bottom Strain%
Top Shed Line Strain%
Bottom Shed Line Strain%
Strain as Share of Breaking Extension%
Abrasion Exposure Index%-cycles/m
Shed Cycles per Metre of Cloth/m
Shed Cycles per Hour/h
Top Shed Angle at the Healddeg
Total Heald Traversemm
Ends per Dent—

Worked example

Given

0
Top shed 32 mm, bottom 28 mm at the healds
1
300 mm fell to heald, 550 mm heald to back rest
2
Yarn breaking extension 6%
3
22 picks/cm at 550 rpm, 28 ends/cm through a 7 dent/cm reed

Substituting

top: sqrt( 300^2 + 32^2 ) = 301.7018, sqrt( 550^2 + 32^2 ) = 550.9301sum 852.6319 against 850 straight, so 0.3096%bottom at 28 mm gives 0.2372%, mean 0.2734%utilisation = 0.2734 / 6 x 100 = 4.5569%index = 0.2734 x 2,200 = 601.5139

Answer

0
Mean strain 0.2734%, top 0.3096% against bottom 0.2372%
1
Asymmetry 0.0725 percentage points
2
Using 4.5569% of the yarn's breaking extension
3
2,200 shed cycles per metre, 33,000 per hour
4
Abrasion exposure index 601.5139, top shed angle 6.0885 deg, 4 ends per dent

Move the fell-to-heald distance from 300 mm to 250 mm and the top strain rises to 0.4064% - a 31% increase from a 50 mm setting change nobody would record as significant. That sensitivity is why front shed distance is the first thing to check when warp breaks rise after a style change, and why it is worth calculating rather than eyeballing.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Shed Geometry and Yarn & Construction. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in %.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Top Minus Bottom Strain, Top Shed Line Strain, Bottom Shed Line Strain, Strain as Share of Breaking Extension, Abrasion Exposure Index, Shed Cycles per Metre of Cloth, Shed Cycles per Hour, Top Shed Angle at the Heald, Total Heald Traverse and Ends per Dent) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Top Shed Line Deflection) shows how much of the gap in Mean Warp Strain at Full Shed each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
0.2 - 0.5% mean strainNormal for staple warp on a shuttleless loom.
Above 0.8%Aggressive. Acceptable only on high-extension filament, not on sized cotton.
Utilisation under 8%The shed is taking a small fraction of the yarn's extension, as it should.
Asymmetry 0.05 - 0.10 pointsA conventionally set unequal shed.

Assumptions and limits

  • This is the static geometric strain at full shed and it understates the true loading in two ways. The shed opens and closes once per pick, so the strain is dynamic and the yarn sees a strain rate rather than a held extension; at 550 rpm the full cycle occupies about 0.1 s. And beat-up superimposes a further tension peak, typically 20 to 40% above the static value, at the moment the reed drives the pick home. The calculation treats one heald frame with one pair of distances; on a loom with graduated shed the frames differ and each should be computed separately. Back rest height and its vertical offset from the warp line change the top-bottom split substantially and are not modelled here - only the deflections at the heald are taken as given. The abrasion index is a relative ranking quantity for comparing constructions on one machine, not an absolute break rate.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Top Shed Line Deflection 1 to 120 mm, Bottom Shed Line Deflection 1 to 120 mm and Cloth Fell to Heald 50 to 900 mm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ISO 3572 - textiles, weaving, definitions of general terms and basic weave structures.
  • ISO 2062 - determination of single-end breaking force and elongation of yarns.
  • ISO 7211-2 - woven fabrics, construction, determination of number of threads per unit length.
  • ASTM D2256 - tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method, for breaking extension.

Questions people ask

Why does the front shed distance matter so much more than the back?

Because strain from a deflection depends on the angle, and the angle is set by the ratio of deflection to distance. The same 32 mm at 300 mm is a 6.09 degree deflection; at 550 mm it is 3.33 degrees. Path length grows roughly with the square of the angle for small angles, so the short front leg contributes about three times the strain of the long back leg for the same deflection. Practically this means the fell-to-heald distance is the most powerful single setting on the loom for warp strain, and it is also the one that changes silently when the fell position drifts or when a different reed or temple arrangement is fitted.

Should the shed be as small as possible then?

Only down to the point where the weft can still cross cleanly, which is a hard floor. The shed must clear the weft carrier - a rapier head, a projectile, or in air-jet the free flight path plus the relay nozzle geometry - and it must open enough for the warp sheets to separate cleanly without sticking ends bridging the gap, which is a function of hairiness and sizing as much as of geometry. Below that floor you trade warp breaks for weft stops and fabric faults, which is not a trade that pays. The useful range is narrow, which is precisely why calculating the strain is worthwhile: the choice inside that range is real, and it is usually made by habit.

Is the strain the same for every heald frame?

No, and this calculation treats one representative frame. Frames further back sit at a greater distance from the fell and, on most looms, are given a proportionally larger shed to keep the shed lines converging at the fell - which roughly equalises the strain but never exactly. On a loom with a level shed the rear frames strain more; on one with a graduated shed the difference is largely designed out. The practical consequence shows in the break pattern: if warp breaks concentrate on particular frames, the shed graduation or the heald height setting is the first suspect, and it is worth running this calculation for the front and rear frame separately with their own distances and deflections.

How does the abrasion exposure index relate to actual warp breaks?

It is a comparative index, not a predictor. Warp breaks depend on the exposure calculated here, on the abrasion resistance of the sized yarn, on heald eye and reed condition, on the weave pattern, and on how many neighbours each end rubs against - none of which appear in this figure. What the index does well is rank constructions on the same loom with the same yarn: a construction with double the index will break substantially more ends, and if it does not, the difference is being absorbed somewhere worth understanding. Use it alongside the sized yarn abrasion figure, which measures the other half of the same problem.

Scroll to Top