Home » Calculators » Knitting » Knitting, Hosiery & Stretch-Fabric Control » Knitting Fault Locator: Repeat Spacing to Feeders and Needles
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Knitting Fault Diagnosis

Knitting Fault Locator: Repeat Spacing to Feeders and Needles

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

Measure the spacing before you open the machine. The fabric already knows which part failed.

Measured Repeat From the inspection table, with a rule
cm
cm
/cm
/cm
The Machine What the counts have to divide into

Feeders Involved

—

Evenly spaced around the machine

Course & Wale Address of the Fault

Needles Involved
—
Courses Between Repeats
—
Wales Between Repeats
—
Machine Revolutions per Repeat
—
Spacing a Single Faulty Feeder Would Give
— cm
Fabric Width per Cylinder Revolution
— cm
Repeats per Metre of Fabric
— /m
Wale Pitch
— mm

Every quantity in this calculation is an integer in reality, so a fractional result is a measurement problem rather than a finding - measure the fault spacing across ten repeats and divide, and take stitch density on the same relaxed piece of fabric. The method assumes the fault repeats evenly, which covers feeder-related banding and needle-related lines but not faults that drift, appear once, or follow a pattern repeat; a fault whose spacing matches the design repeat is a pattern or programming issue and not a mechanical one. Needle count should be the actual count for the cylinder rather than the geometric figure from gauge and diameter, since needles removed for a pattern change the divisor. Faults arising in the yarn, at the creel, or in dyeing have no fixed geometric period and will not resolve to a whole number here - which is itself the diagnosis.

Using this calculator

About the Knitting Fault Locator: Repeat Spacing to Feeders and Needles

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

Centimetres to courses
coursesPerRepeat = verticalSpacing x coursesPerCm

Courses are the unit the machine works in. A measurement in centimetres means nothing until it is expressed in courses, because it is courses that map onto feeders.

The diagnostic step
feedersImplicated = feeders / coursesPerRepeat

Every feeder knits one course per revolution, so the feeder sequence repeats every N courses where N is the feeder count. A fault repeating every 24 courses on a 96 feeder machine means four feeders, evenly spaced 24 apart, are doing the same thing wrong.

The same logic around the cylinder
needlesImplicated = needles / walesPerRepeat

A vertical line repeating every 39 wales on a 2,262 needle cylinder implicates 58 needles at that interval - which on most machines means a cam track or a needle batch rather than individual damage.

The spacing to compare against
singleFeederBand = feeders / coursesPerCm

One faulty feeder gives one band per machine revolution. If the measured spacing matches this figure the answer is a single feeder; anything closer means several.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
courseOne horizontal row of loops, knitted by one feeder—
waleOne vertical column of loops, made by one needle—
feederOne yarn supply point; each knits one course per revolution—
repeatThe distance at which the fault reappearscm

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 6 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Vertical Spacing of the Fault, Horizontal Spacing of the Fault, Courses, Wales, Feeders and Needles in the Cylinder.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Feeders Involved together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Needles Involved, Courses Between Repeats, Wales Between Repeats, Machine Revolutions per Repeat, Spacing a Single Faulty Feeder Would Give, Fabric Width per Cylinder Revolution, Repeats per Metre of Fabric and Wale Pitch — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Vertical Spacing of the Faultcm0.05 to 100 cm1.5
Horizontal Spacing of the Faultcm0.05 to 200 cm3
Courses/cm2 to 80 /cm16
Wales/cm2 to 80 /cm13
Feeders—1 to 25096
Needles in the Cylinder—20 to 60002262

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Feeders Involved (headline result)—Evenly spaced around the machine
Needles Involved—
Courses Between Repeats—
Wales Between Repeats—
Machine Revolutions per Repeat—
Spacing a Single Faulty Feeder Would Givecm
Fabric Width per Cylinder Revolutioncm
Repeats per Metre of Fabric/m
Wale Pitchmm

Worked example

Given

0
Horizontal bands measured 1.5 cm apart
1
Vertical lines measured 3.0 cm apart
2
Fabric at 16 courses and 13 wales per cm
3
96 feeder machine with 2,262 needles

Substituting

courses = 1.5 x 16 = 24feeders = 96 / 24 = 4wales = 3.0 x 13 = 39needles = 2,262 / 39 = 58single feeder band = 96 / 16 = 6 cm

Answer

0
24 courses between bands, so 4 feeders are involved
1
39 wales between lines, so 58 needles are involved
2
The repeat occupies a quarter of a machine revolution
3
A single faulty feeder would band at 6 cm, not 1.5 cm
4
66.6667 repeats per metre, wale pitch 0.7692 mm

Four feeders spaced exactly 24 apart on a 96 feeder machine is not four independent failures - it is one cause acting on every twenty-fourth feeder, which on most machines means one yarn path, one creel section or one cam segment. That is a completely different investigation from four random feeders, and the difference is visible in the fabric before anyone opens a door.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Measured Repeat and The Machine. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Feeders Involved in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in the unit shown.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Needles Involved, Courses Between Repeats, Wales Between Repeats, Machine Revolutions per Repeat, Spacing a Single Faulty Feeder Would Give, Fabric Width per Cylinder Revolution, Repeats per Metre of Fabric and Wale Pitch) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Feeders Involved before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Knitting, Hosiery & Stretch-Fabric Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Feeders Involved is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Vertical Spacing of the Fault) shows how much of the gap in Feeders Involved each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Knitting, Hosiery & Stretch-Fabric Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
Feeders involved = 1A single feeder: its yarn, tensioner, feed wheel or guide.
Feeders a small whole numberOne shared cause on evenly spaced feeders - a creel section, a cam segment, a yarn lot.
Needles involved = 1A single damaged needle or sinker. The classic vertical line.
Result not a whole numberRe-measure over ten repeats. The fault is not evenly spaced, or the density is wrong.

Assumptions and limits

  • Every quantity in this calculation is an integer in reality, so a fractional result is a measurement problem rather than a finding - measure the fault spacing across ten repeats and divide, and take stitch density on the same relaxed piece of fabric. The method assumes the fault repeats evenly, which covers feeder-related banding and needle-related lines but not faults that drift, appear once, or follow a pattern repeat; a fault whose spacing matches the design repeat is a pattern or programming issue and not a mechanical one. Needle count should be the actual count for the cylinder rather than the geometric figure from gauge and diameter, since needles removed for a pattern change the divisor. Faults arising in the yarn, at the creel, or in dyeing have no fixed geometric period and will not resolve to a whole number here - which is itself the diagnosis.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Vertical Spacing of the Fault 0.05 to 100 cm, Horizontal Spacing of the Fault 0.05 to 200 cm and Courses 2 to 80 /cm, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ISO 4921 - knitting, basic concepts, vocabulary.
  • ASTM D3990 - terminology relating to fabric defects.
  • ASTM D5430 - visually inspecting and grading fabrics.
  • ASTM D3887 - tolerances for knitted fabrics.

Questions people ask

Why does a non-whole-number answer mean re-measure rather than something interesting?

Because the physical quantities involved are integers. There is a whole number of feeders and a whole number of needles, and a repeating fault must occupy a whole number of courses and wales - there is no mechanism that produces a fault every 23.4 courses. A fractional answer therefore means one of the inputs is wrong, and it is almost always the measurement or the stitch density rather than the machine. Measuring one repeat with a rule on a soft, extensible fabric is good to perhaps ten per cent; measuring across ten repeats and dividing is good to one per cent, and that is usually the difference between a fractional answer and an obvious one. Stitch density measured on tensioned fabric produces the same error.

What causes evenly spaced groups of feeders to fail together?

Shared infrastructure, and the spacing usually names it. On most large-diameter machines the feeders are grouped - four or six per creel section, per positive feeder belt segment, per yarn carrier plate, or per cam track on a multi-track machine - and the grouping is geometric, so a fault in one shared component appears at a fixed feeder interval. Four feeders on a 96 feeder machine is an interval of 24, which typically corresponds to a quarter of the creel or one of four drive belt segments. The practical method is to identify the four feeder numbers from the fabric, walk to them, and look for what they have in common rather than what is wrong with each.

Can this distinguish a yarn-lot barre from a machine barre?

Yes, and it is the most valuable thing it does. Machine-caused banding has a fixed geometric period - it is set by feeder count and course density and nothing else, so it is identical on every metre of the roll. Yarn-lot barre has no geometric period at all: it appears when a package of different yarn runs out onto the machine, so its spacing is measured in the hundreds of metres of yarn a package holds, and it drifts. Dyeing barre similarly has no fixed period. So if the measured spacing converts to a clean whole number of feeders, the cause is on the machine; if the spacing is irregular or measured in metres rather than centimetres, the machine is innocent and the investigation moves to the creel or the yarn store.

Does this work on a fabric that has already been finished?

It does, provided the stitch density used is the density of the fabric being measured rather than the greige figure. Finishing moves courses and wales per centimetre substantially - a fabric that knitted at 14 courses/cm may inspect at 20 - and using the wrong density scales the answer by that ratio, which will turn four feeders into six and send the investigation to the wrong parts. Measure both the fault spacing and the stitch density on the same piece of fabric, in the same relaxed state, and the arithmetic holds regardless of how much finishing has moved them, because both the fault and the density moved together.

Scroll to Top