Home » Calculators » Weaving & Fabric Formation » Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control » Sized Yarn Abrasion Resistance, Hairiness Gain & Add-On Adequacy
Jump to a calculator 618 tools

Sizing Control

Sized Yarn Abrasion Resistance, Hairiness Gain & Add-On Adequacy

Put this calculator on your own site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It works on any site — WordPress, Squarespace, Webflow, Ghost or plain HTML — and needs no JavaScript of yours. It carries a link back here, which is the only thing we ask for it.

See what it looks like

The size box is usually right about the recipe and wrong about the quantity.

Abrasion Test Pair Cycles to failure, unsized and sized
cycles
cycles
%
cycles

From a machine that runs this fabric acceptably

Hairiness & Economics What the size film does, and what it costs
S3/m
S3/m
t/yr
/kg

Add-On Above What the Loom Needs

— %

Negative means the yarn is under-sized for this loom

Abrasion Gain, Weavability & Cost of Over-Sizing

Add-On That Just Meets Demand
— %
Weavability Index
— x
Abrasion Improvement
— x
Cycles Gained per Point of Add-On
— cycles/%
Hairiness Reduction
— %
Size Solids Saved
— kg/t
Size Solids Saved
— kg/yr
Value of the Surplus
— /yr

The slope is a chord between two measured points and is only reliable near the tested add-on; abrasion resistance against add-on saturates, so extrapolating far below the tested point understates the true resistance and far above it overstates it. Abrasion cycle counts are highly variable specimen to specimen - coefficients of variation of 20 to 30% are normal - so both figures should be means of at least twenty breaks, and a difference smaller than the scatter is not a difference. The demand figure is specific to a machine group and a construction and must be re-established when either changes. Hairiness reduction is reported from the values entered and is not used in the add-on arithmetic; it is the second reason sizing exists and it saturates at a different add-on than abrasion does. Nothing here accounts for size recipe: a change of polymer at constant add-on can move the abrasion figure more than a two-point change of quantity.

Using this calculator

About the Sized Yarn Abrasion Resistance, Hairiness Gain & Add-On Adequacy

The formula

This is the expression the tool evaluates. Every term is named underneath, with the unit it must be supplied in.

The slope the test pair establishes
cyclesPerPoint = ( sizedCycles - unsizedCycles ) / addOnPct

One measured pair gives one slope. It is a chord between two points on a curve that flattens at high add-on, not a universal constant, which is why the extrapolation below is only trustworthy near the tested add-on.

Back to the add-on the loom justifies
requiredAddOn = ( demandCycles - unsizedCycles ) / cyclesPerPoint

Reads the slope backwards to the abrasion the machine actually demands. Everything above that point is size paste applied to satisfy habit rather than the shed.

Margin over demand, as a ratio
weavabilityIndex = sizedCycles / demandCycles

Below 1.0 the yarn will not survive the shed and warp breaks will dominate the stop pattern. Far above 1.0 the loom is paying in desizing load and effluent for abrasion resistance it never uses.

Add-On points to kilograms
sizeSaved = surplusAddOn / 100 x 1000 kg per tonne of warp

Add-on is mass of size solids per mass of yarn, so a point of add-on is ten kilograms of solids per tonne of warp. That conversion is what turns a laboratory argument into a purchasing one.

Symbols used above
SymbolStands forUnit
add-onDry size solids as a percentage of unsized yarn mass%
S3/mZweigle hairiness - hairs of 3 mm and longer per metreS3/m
cycleOne reciprocation of the abrader against the yarn until it breaks—
weavabilitySized abrasion resistance divided by the loom's demandx

How the result is derived

Step by step, from the values you type to the figure on screen.

  1. The 8 inputs are read from the form on every keystroke: Unsized Yarn, Sized Yarn, Size Add-On on the Tested Yarn, Abrasion the Loom Demands, Hairiness Before Sizing, Hairiness After Sizing, Warp Sized and Size Solids Cost.
  2. Each value is checked against the accepted range in the input table below. A value outside its range stops the calculation rather than producing a misleading figure — the results blank out and a message appears.
  3. The validated values are substituted into the expression above, which resolves Add-On Above What the Loom Needs together with every supporting figure in one pass — no value is carried over from a previous entry.
  4. The supporting outputs — Add-On That Just Meets Demand, Weavability Index, Abrasion Improvement, Cycles Gained per Point of Add-On, Hairiness Reduction, Size Solids Saved, Size Solids Saved and Value of the Surplus — come from the same pass, so they always describe the same case as the headline figure.
  5. Results are rounded for display only. The full-precision value is used throughout the chain, so reading a rounded intermediate figure back into the tool by hand can shift the last digit.

What each input means

Where to read each value on the floor, the unit it must be in, and the range the tool accepts.

InputUnitAccepted rangeDefaultWhat it means
Unsized Yarncycles1 to 2000 cycles45
Sized Yarncycles1 to 5000 cycles185
Size Add-On on the Tested Yarn%0.5 to 25 %11
Abrasion the Loom Demandscycles1 to 5000 cycles140From a machine that runs this fabric acceptably
Hairiness Before SizingS3/m0.1 to 60 S3/m6.2
Hairiness After SizingS3/m0.01 to 60 S3/m2.1
Warp Sizedt/yr10 to 20000 t/yr900
Size Solids Cost/kg0.1 to 20 /kg1.15

What the tool returns

The headline figure and every supporting value it is built from.

OutputUnitWhat it tells you
Add-On Above What the Loom Needs (headline result)%Negative means the yarn is under-sized for this loom
Add-On That Just Meets Demand%
Weavability Indexx
Abrasion Improvementx
Cycles Gained per Point of Add-Oncycles/%
Hairiness Reduction%
Size Solids Savedkg/t
Size Solids Savedkg/yr
Value of the Surplus/yr

Worked example

Given

0
Unsized 45 cycles, sized 185 cycles at 11% add-on
1
This loom runs acceptably on yarn testing 140 cycles
2
Hairiness 6.2 to 2.1 S3/m
3
900 t of warp a year, size solids at 1.15/kg

Substituting

slope = ( 185 - 45 ) / 11 = 12.7273 cycles per %required = ( 140 - 45 ) / 12.7273 = 7.4643%surplus = 11 - 7.4643 = 3.5357%kg per tonne = 3.5357 / 100 x 1000 = 35.3571annual = 35.3571 x 900 x 1.15 = 36,594.64

Answer

0
Abrasion improved 4.1111x, 12.7273 cycles per point of add-on
1
Weavability index 1.3214 - comfortably above demand
2
7.4643% add-on would meet demand, so 3.5357% is surplus
3
Hairiness down 66.129%
4
35.3571 kg/t, 31,821.4286 kg/yr, worth 36,594.6429

Do not act on this in one step. The honest use is to run the size box down in half-point stages toward 9%, testing abrasion and watching the warp stop rate at each stage, and to stop at the first sign of movement in either. The calculation says the headroom exists; only the loom says how much of it is real, because the demand figure came from one fabric on one machine and the slope came from one pair of specimens.

How to use it

  1. Work through the input groups in order — Abrasion Test Pair and Hairiness & Economics. The defaults are a realistic case, so you can change one value at a time and watch what moves.
  2. There is no calculate button. Every figure recalculates as you type or drag, which is what makes this usable for a what-if sweep rather than a single answer.
  3. Read Add-On Above What the Loom Needs in the dark results panel — that is the headline figure, expressed in %.
  4. Check the supporting rows underneath (Add-On That Just Meets Demand, Weavability Index, Abrasion Improvement, Cycles Gained per Point of Add-On, Hairiness Reduction, Size Solids Saved, Size Solids Saved and Value of the Surplus) before acting on the headline — they are where an implausible input usually shows itself first.
  5. Reset to defaults returns every field to the reference case, which is the quickest way to check whether a surprising result came from the tool or from an input you had changed earlier.

Where this is used

  • Process planning — establishing Add-On Above What the Loom Needs before a trial is booked, so machine time and material in Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control are committed against a calculated figure rather than an estimate.
  • Costing and quotation — Add-On Above What the Loom Needs is an input to the cost sheet, and quoting from a worked number rather than a remembered one is what keeps a margin intact.
  • Troubleshooting — when the floor result drifts from plan, entering the measured values (starting with Unsized Yarn) shows how much of the gap in Add-On Above What the Loom Needs each variable explains.
  • Teaching and study — the accepted ranges bracket normal Warping, Sizing, Weaving & Fabric Formation Control practice, so moving one variable at a time shows the shape of the relationship rather than a single answer.

Reading the result

Typical bands and what each one is telling you.

ValueWhat it indicates
Weavability 1.2 - 1.5xA sensible working margin over measured demand.
Below 1.0xUnder-sized. Expect warp breaks to dominate the loom stop Pareto.
Abrasion improvement 3 - 5xNormal for cotton at 9 - 12% add-on with a starch-PVA blend.
Hairiness reduction 55 - 75%What a well-formed size film achieves; below 40% suggests poor film formation or wet splitting.

Assumptions and limits

  • The slope is a chord between two measured points and is only reliable near the tested add-on; abrasion resistance against add-on saturates, so extrapolating far below the tested point understates the true resistance and far above it overstates it. Abrasion cycle counts are highly variable specimen to specimen - coefficients of variation of 20 to 30% are normal - so both figures should be means of at least twenty breaks, and a difference smaller than the scatter is not a difference. The demand figure is specific to a machine group and a construction and must be re-established when either changes. Hairiness reduction is reported from the values entered and is not used in the add-on arithmetic; it is the second reason sizing exists and it saturates at a different add-on than abrasion does. Nothing here accounts for size recipe: a change of polymer at constant add-on can move the abrasion figure more than a two-point change of quantity.
  • Every input is bounded to the range normal practice occupies (Unsized Yarn 1 to 2000 cycles, Sized Yarn 1 to 5000 cycles and Size Add-On on the Tested Yarn 0.5 to 25 %, and so on for the rest). Those bounds are guard rails against typing errors, not a claim that the formula fails one unit outside them.
  • The calculation is deterministic: the same inputs always give the same result. It carries no allowance for machine condition, operator skill, ambient conditions or lot-to-lot material variation unless an input above explicitly represents one.
  • Nothing is sent anywhere. The maths runs in your browser, so the numbers you type never leave the page.

Standards and further reading

  • ASTM D629 - quantitative analysis of textiles, the reference route to size add-on by desizing.
  • ASTM D5647 - measuring hairiness of yarns by the photo-electric apparatus.
  • ISO 16549 - textiles, unevenness of textile strands, capacitance method.
  • ASTM D2256 - tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method, for the strength side of the sizing balance.

Questions people ask

Why is abrasion the right test for sizing rather than tensile strength?

Because warp ends in a shed do not fail in tension. Sizing does raise breaking load, typically by ten to twenty per cent, and that improvement is easy to measure and almost irrelevant - the warp tension on a loom is around a tenth of the yarn's breaking load, so tensile margin was never the constraint. What kills an end is repeated rubbing against the heald eye, the reed dents and its neighbours, thousands of times per metre of cloth, and that is a fatigue-abrasion failure. Abrasion cycles measure exactly that mechanism, which is why a size that adds strength but forms a brittle film can test well tensile and weave badly.

Where does the abrasion demand figure come from?

From your own looms, not from a book. It is the abrasion cycle count of a sized yarn that is known to run acceptably on the machine and fabric in question - measured on a retained sample from a warp whose stop rate the weaving master was satisfied with. It is machine-specific and construction-specific: a high-speed air-jet with a deep shed and a dense reed demands substantially more than a slow rapier on an open construction, and the same yarn can be generously sized for one and marginal for the other. A mill that maintains this figure per machine group has the single most useful number in sizing control; one that does not is guessing, usually upward.

Is the linear extrapolation to a lower add-on safe?

Over a narrow range, and downward, it is reasonable; over a wide range it is not. Abrasion resistance against add-on is a saturating curve - the first points of size penetrate and bind the surface fibres where they do the most good, and later points build film thickness with diminishing return. A chord drawn between 0% and 11% therefore understates the slope near zero and overstates it near eleven, which means the required add-on computed here is conservative in the useful direction: the true curve is likely to reach the demand figure at a slightly lower add-on than the linear estimate. The way to remove the doubt is to test a third point at the proposed add-on rather than trusting either the line or this note.

What does over-sizing cost beyond the size itself?

More than the paste. Every extra point of add-on has to be removed again in desizing, so it becomes chemical oxygen demand in the effluent, steam in the desize wash, and time on the range. It stiffens the yarn, which raises the load on the loom's let-off and can worsen shed geometry problems rather than help them. It increases size box drag and can raise wet splitting problems at the drying cylinders. And on the finished fabric, residual size that survived desizing shows up as uneven dye uptake - a defect that gets diagnosed as a dyehouse problem three departments away from the size box that caused it. The kilogram figure here is the smallest part of the true cost.

Scroll to Top